On 22/8/07 (12:12) [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: >Are you serving up your hacked stylesheet to everyone, or just to those >crippled by IE? >The latter is far more acceptable than the former, in my opinion.
Just the victims of IE. I'm of the opinion that hacks -- ie. workarounds exploiting browser bugs and loopholes in css implementation -- are an inferior solution compared to serving valid browser-specific css via conditional commenting, simply because the bugs and loopholes can get fixed or closed at any time, potentially breaking hack-based css. Cond.comments, on the other hand, are an official M$-approved technique and as such should be around for the foreseeable future. But sometimes the CSS that needs to go into the Conditionally Commented stylesheet isn't valid -- IE's filters being a prime example. -- Rick Lecoat ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************
