code for standards compliant browsers and let ie fall where it may. dwain On 1/24/08, Ben Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > crikey, that's some list. thanks Russ. > > > It's disturbing how well lemurs can illustrate the issue, too: > http://www.katemonkey.co.uk/article/48/x-ua-lemur-compatible > (the Zeldman lemur cracked me up completely) > > On the issue... it's something MS simply won't back down on no matter what > any of us think. So we may as well figure out how to deal with it. > > Standardistas can go for the "edge" option or they can let IE stagnate at > IE7 or whatever version ends up being the easiest to develop > for. Or they can seriously tag their documents according to tested documents. > > > Implementation specifics aside (yes I still think it's spam), the version > target feature offers us a chance to lock our sites to the most convenient > version of IE. MS has invited us to ignore their newer products. We can opt > to save our energy for standards-based browsers and not bother learning new > versions of IE. Lazy? Pragmatic? Mercenary? > > Discuss? :) Surely this list has some opinions... > > cheers, > Ben > > -- > --- <http://weblog.200ok.com.au/> > --- The future has arrived; it's just not > --- evenly distributed. - William Gibson > ******************************************************************* > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm > Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > *******************************************************************
-- dwain alford "The artist may use any form which his expression demands; for his inner impulse must find suitable expression." Kandinsky ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************