A decent spam filter will get rid of most, if not all, of the junk - why not
encourage your clients to get a good spam filter or use an email client with
a good built-in filter?

Jason

On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:58 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> My 2 cents: I'm one of those "standards freaks". But when my clients became
> overwhelmed with SPAM from their contact forms I had to bend the rules. And
> when I say "overwhelmed" I'm talking about several hundred SPAM emails for
> every one or two legitimate inquiries. I tried many "standards compliant"
> anti-SPAM techniques but the SPAMmers always found a way around them.
>
> Then I used JavaScript. It worked. It's still working. Not one single SPAM
> has gotten through in over two years.
>
> One could argue that JavaScript renders the contact form unusable for five
> percent of the population. But without it, the SPAMmers would render it
> unusable for a hundred percent of the population. My clients aren't going to
> sift through hundreds of emails to find the needle in the haystack. I
> wouldn't either.
>
> It's not possible to make everyone happy. Use your best judgment.
>
> -- Marcello :-)
>
>
> >  -------Original Message-------
> >  From: Chris Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >  Subject: RE: [WSG] a good practise for adding email link (mailto)?
> >  Sent: Jun 16 '08 10:18
> >
> >  Michael,
> >
> >  What if JavaScript isn't enabled or available on my smartphone? I
> presume your websites are not for people accessing the web while on the
> move, as well as people whose preference or requirement is to use a web
> client without JavaScript.
> >
> >  These "standard[s] freaks" you seem to think so little of *are* trying
> to make the web a better place for users - by levelling the playing field,
> making things fairer and ensuring we all stick to the same high standards.
> You can choose not to do that which is fine by me - my websites will gladly
> accept the visitors (and customers) who can't use yours.
> >
> >  Chris
> >
> >
> >
> >  -----Original Message-----
> >  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Michael Persson
> >  Sent: 16 June 2008 10:53
> >  To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> >  Subject: Re: [WSG] a good practise for adding email link (mailto)?
> >
> >
> >  The best way is a form that also has a secure SPAM code or just make a
> image
> >  that search engines cannot read...
> >
> >  I believe that people that does not have Javascript working are not
> >  using internet
> >  for the purpose i produce websites for, and im sorry we cant accept all
> >  kind of users.
> >  Also users has to follow the standard where website production also is
> >  based in
> >  the clients need and NOT on web standards.
> >
> >  Standard freaks are trying to make things better for web standards and
> >  not for the clients
> >  or visitors in general...
> >
> >  There is a war and it will always be there.... until understanding from
> >  all parts are met.
> >
> >  Michael
> >
> >
> >
> >  James Leslie wrote:
> >  > Why is this the "best way"? It means that anyone without JavaScript
> >  > enabled cannot contact you. Spam is a pain, but not giving a user the
> >  > basic opportunity of contacting you is a bigger problem IMO.
> >  > I think mailto's and spam filters are the "best way" to go, as they
> >  > are accessible for everyone.
> >  >
> >  > J
> >  >
> >  >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  > *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Fuji kusaka
> >  > *Sent:* 13 June 2008 05:23
> >  > *To:* wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> >  > *Subject:* Re: [WSG] a good practise for adding email link (mailto)?
> >  >
> >  > Hi
> >  >
> >  > The best way is to encrypt the email address and make use of a js.
> >  > This will avoid loads of problems specially spamming.
> >  >
> >  > This is simple just follow the instructions here
> >  >
> >  > http://jumk.de/nospam/stopspam.html
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > Fuji
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 6:22 AM, tee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> >  >
> >  >     This is one of the thing I can't decide. At time, it seemed
> >  >     nothing wrong to have an email link (js encrypted, not mailto that
> >  >     shows email address nakely to Mr. Spam King), but as many people
> >  >     are actually using webmail, or sometimes access websites via
> >  >     public computer (internet cafe or library for instance), I find
> >  >     that having email link actually is causing usability for users.
> >  >
> >  >     When client insists on having direct email link. What do you do so
> >  >     that it won't cause problem for above users?
> >  >
> >  >     Thanks!
> >  >
> >  >     tee
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> *******************************************************************
> >  >     List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> >  >     Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> >  >     Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >  >
> *******************************************************************
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  > --
> >  > Fuji kusaka
> >  > *******************************************************************
> >  > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> >  > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> >  > Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  > *******************************************************************
> >  > *******************************************************************
> >  > List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> >  > Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> >  > Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  > *******************************************************************
> >
> >
> >
> >  *******************************************************************
> >  List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> >  Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> >  Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  *******************************************************************
> >
> >
> >
> >  This message has been scanned for malware by SurfControl plc.
> www.surfcontrol.com
> >
> >
> >  *******************************************************************
> >  List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> >  Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> >  Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  *******************************************************************
> >
> >
>
>
> *******************************************************************
> List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
> Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
> Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *******************************************************************
>
>


*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************

Reply via email to