other than making sense and having a strong connection with the page
the content is on, there is no direct reason, other than being a bit
sensible about it, I wouldn't advise testing out the 2048 characters.
On 05/11/2008, at 9:32 AM, James Ellis wrote:
RFC 2616 (HTTP/1.1) doesn't set a maximum length on a url but I
think our friend IE limits it to about 2048 characters (see google).
Either way, there is no good reason I can see to limit a url path to
a certain number of characters.
================================
Joseph Ortenzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+61 (0)434 047 804
http://www.typingthevoid.com
http://twitter.com/wheelyweb
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jortenzi
Skype:wheelyweb
http://au.movember.com/mospace/1714401
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
