I said no direct reason, but you point is a good reason to consider
short URLs but this is not always possible, but yes, typablity is a
good thing too.
On 05/11/2008, at 11:27 AM, silky wrote:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Joe Ortenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
other than making sense and having a strong connection with the
page the
content is on, there is no direct reason, other than being a bit
sensible
about it, I wouldn't advise testing out the 2048 characters.
of course there is a good reason: so it's typable. not every url
should required to be clicked to be gotten to.
--
noon silky
http://skillsforvilla.tumblr.com/
http://www.themonkeynet.com/armada/
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
================================
Joseph Ortenzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+61 (0)434 047 804
http://www.typingthevoid.com
http://twitter.com/wheelyweb
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jortenzi
Skype:wheelyweb
http://au.movember.com/mospace/1714401
*******************************************************************
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*******************************************************************
