John Labenski wrote:
On 2/12/06, klaas.holwerda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Francesco Montorsi wrote:
Hi,
since build system is now quite stable I'd like to write a few notes
about it for users.
I see that there are some .txt files in docs\ but before updating them
(I would touch only building.txt anyway), I think we should decide if
we want to keep them as plain TXT file or choose HTML (wxArt2d has a
nice install.html:
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/wxart2d/wxArt2D/install.html)...
Just let me know,
please please HTML, it is so much better. And for editing www.nvu.com is
free and good.
I dunno, I think everyone else always just uses text files, in fact I
can't remember ever using a project that has them in any other form.
I can, you are working to much on Linux.
On windows it is hlp/chm or html.
But i went through my tool dir, even many linux orginating tools use
often html or redirect
through a readme file to docs/index.html.
We can not do hlp/chm but for platfrom independent tooling html is no
problem.
They're a lot easier to read on the command line.
Like i say ;-)
I don't envision a large amount of documentation for wxLua, just
build, install, usage, and differences to the wxWidgets c++ docs.
I wish there was some more. Like how it is organized internal , source
documentation in doxygen.
I still vote for HTML.
Regards,
Klaas
--
Unclassified
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Wxlua-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxlua-users
