On 2/13/06, k. holwerda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>please please HTML, it is so much better. And for editing www.nvu.com is
> >>free and good.
> >
> >I dunno, I think everyone else always just uses text files, in fact I
> >can't remember ever using a project that has them in any other form.
> >
> I can, you are working to much on Linux.
> On windows it is hlp/chm or html.
> But i went through my tool dir, even many linux orginating tools use
> often html or redirect
> through a readme file to docs/index.html.
> We can not do hlp/chm but for platfrom independent tooling html is no
> problem.
>
> >They're a lot easier to read on the command line.
> >
> Like i say ;-)
>
> >I don't envision a large amount of documentation for wxLua, just
> >build, install, usage, and differences to the wxWidgets c++ docs.
> >
> I wish there was some more. Like how it is organized internal , source
> documentation in doxygen.
>
> I still vote for HTML.
Allright, I'll try nvu. I've tried in the past to use a WYSIWYG to
write really simple, clean, readable HTML and found that the Mozilla
editor was the best, but every now and then it would really garble
things up. I think they can get very confused and stick in millions of
  and trash the layout of tables. The HTML they generate is fine,
but it's completely unreadable as text.
Regards,
John Labenski
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Wxlua-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxlua-users
