On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Matthew Monaco <dgbale...@verizon.net> wrote:
> That's a reasonable idea but not really part of increasing the "desktop" > functionality. The ability to install packages to ~/.local is a distribution > / personal consideration. I suppose that's true, it doesn't directly effect desktop functionality. Yet I think it's not unreasonable to consider some broader ideas beyond the immediate desktop to gain indirect benefits that further free-desktop goals. In fact, I actually think just saying "you can think of ~/.local/ as the per-user variation of /usr or /usr/local" in the documentation would go a long way in clarifying the spec. _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list xdg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
