Hi Andy, Thanx for your advice.
I used nm and got the same return as yours. Also i add "ddc", this time the symbol not warning again but still core dump. I have removed Red Hat and only left its XF86Config as attached. Red Hat 9 come with XFree86 4.3.0_2. My current FreeBSD is 5.0 but XFree86 4.3.0 for BSD5.1 packages. I think it doesn't matter. (Am I wrong?) In the laptop I have tried FreeBSD 4.8 with XFree86 4.3.0 before, each time told me another symbol warning unresolved in nsc_drv.o. Symbol XAAPatternROP_PM from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/nsc_drv.o is unresolved! I love BSD and decide to use NetBSD when i got message from Alan Barrett http://news.gw.com/netbsd.ports.i386/30161 , but after when i tried to configure XF86, it told me hard to find suitable screen. I return to FB5 then. >On Thursday, June 26, 2003 9:51 am, George wrote: >> >I could install Red Hat 9 in this laptop, which X11 could works very well. >> > But never get success on FreeBSD. I don't know why and get no idea in it. >> > I searched many days in public but never find anyone make it work on >> > FreeBSD, but someone said it could work on NetBSD 1.6.1 but I still >> > couldn't pass X in that way. > >Whoa, that panel information looks... odd. :^) I never knew >???????????? made laptop display panels... and at 65535x65535 >your computer's screen would have to be several meters on a side. I'm going >to take a wild guess here and say that this information is bogus. > >Do you get the same information in Red Hat 9's XFree86's log? > >What version of XFree86 comes with Red Hat 9? 4.3.0? > >Try this: > >$ nm /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/radeon_drv.o | >grep xf86SetDDCproperties > >Tell us what results. On my system, I get > > U xf86SetDDCproperties > >Since my man page for nm(1) is entirely inadequate, I am forced to guess that >U means it's undefined in the .o file but is utilized by one of the functions >actually in the .o file. Besides, there's no address listed. > >However, /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libddc.a defines this symbol. > >$ nm /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libddc.a | >grep xf86SetDDCproperties > >00000000 T xf86SetDDCproperties > >At least, I guess that means it's defined. What does T mean, anyway? It's a >strong symbol, or something like that...? Where can I get help deciphering >nm's output? > >Anyway, check to see if you have /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libddc.a. Try adding >Load "ddc" in your Section "Module" entry at the top of your XF86Config file. > >Finally, there are no Modes lines in the SubSection "Display" entries near the >end of your XF86Config file. I'm probably wrong here, but in my experience >XFree86 can't run without some mode selections. It might be capable of >choosing a default color depth, but I don't know for sure, so I always put a >DefaultDepth line in each of my Section "Screen" entries. > >-- >Andy Goth | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://ioioio.net/ >End communication. > > >_______________________________________________ >XFree86 mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
XF86Config-redhat9.txt
Description: Binary data
XFree86.0.log
Description: Binary data