On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 15:55 -0400, Gaetan Nadon wrote:

> On Fri, 2010-11-05 at 20:27 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> 
> > I got:
> > runtime error: file /usr/X11R7/share/sgml/X11/xorg.xsl line 254
> > element
> > call-template
> > The called template 'add-xml-base' was not found.
> 
> This is related to the xml:base attribute which is defined in the W3C
> XML Base recommendation http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlbase/. 
> 
>         The attribute xml:base may be inserted in XML documents to specify a 
> base URI other 
>         than the base URI of the document or external entity.
> 
> I found on the net a stylesheet that does the same thing as xorg.xsl: 
> 
>         
> http://svn.traduc.org/blame.php?repname=lfs&path=%2Ftrunk%2Fblfs%2Fstylesheets%2Flfs-xsl%2Fdocbook-xsl-snapshot%2Fcommon%2Fstripns.xsl&rev=659&sc=0
> 
> 
> Our xorg stylesheet is calling an "add-xml-base" template that does
> not exist. In the above stylesheet found on the next, this template is
> defined in-line in the file. 
> 
>         <xsl:template name="add-xml-base">
>           <xsl:if test="not(@xml:base)">
>             <xsl:variable name="base">
>             [...]
>         
> 
> When I build xorg-docs, I always get this warning: 
> 
>         WARNING: cannot add @xml:base to node set root element.  Relative 
> paths may not work.
> 
> There must be some differences in the docbook xls software packages or
> the the version of the xsltproc that we use.
> 
> If you have run into this, most likely others will. Other packages
> such as libSM would use the new version of xorg.xsl as well. Does it
> fail the same way?

Just wondering if you had the same problem with other documents.

> 
> In any case, we need more users testing as there are quite a variety
> of xsl packages out there.
> 
> Gaetan 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
> Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
> Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to