On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersm...@oracle.com> wrote: > Gaetan Nadon wrote: >> On Sat, 2010-11-06 at 15:55 -0400, Gaetan Nadon wrote: >>> If you have run into this, most likely others will. Other packages >>> such as libSM would use the new version of xorg.xsl as well. Does it >>> fail the same way? >> Just wondering if you had the same problem with other documents. > > I have not tried again since. I was planning to get the 7.6 docs finished > before trying that again - we'll have plenty of time to work out issues > before the 7.7 release.
Ok. are there any showstoppers for 7.6 as far as the documentation goes? > > Matt Dew wrote: >> Which OS/distro do you get this on? > > That would have been on the development builds of Solaris 11, which is > what I do almost all my work on. (I also have Fedora 14 running in > a VirtualBox, since that was easier than building my own FOP package > for Solaris to generate the PDF docs, and allows me to occasionally > test that I'm not breaking Linux.) > Did the build fail on the fedora box? I ran it on fedora13 and it worked ok. I don't have access to a Solaris box so I'll need your help to figure this one out after the release. Matt _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel