On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 07:25:21AM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > On 02/10/11 07:07 AM, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > > It seems that a useful and representative X.org board is needed, and > > that their primary responsibility should be the funding and maintenance > > of dependable infrastructure for the free software projects on both > > x.org and fd.o. > > > > Hey, what do you know, there are elections coming up. > > Elections in which it was difficult to find enough people willing to > put in the time and deal with crap like this to fill a full slate of > candidates for the available seats. (The initial deadline was extended > when there were only two candidates for 4 seats.) > > I don't see the X.Org board trying to stage a coup and take over > freedesktop.org > though, no matter who gets elected. There's a separate organization for > that, > and we don't have the legal right to take their property away no matter what > we > think about how they're managing it.
So it is better to leave this current situation as is, and have a major part of the infrastructure that X.org and others depend on what i honestly cannot describe as "a organization"? Luc Verhaegen _______________________________________________ xorg@lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org support Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg Your subscription address: arch...@mail-archive.com
