On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 07:22:28AM +0000, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Scott Lampert wrote:
> 
> > I'm having trouble getting DDC to work with my Dell P1110 and my Matrox
> > G550.  No matter what options I add or remove from my device section I
> > get output similar to:
>  
> > Oddly enough, when I run "X -configure" it reads the EDID information
> > successfully and puts the information it garners about the monitor into
> > the XF86Config.new file. 
> 
> There was dispute about whether the mga driver should use the VBE
> code to interrogation, or do it itself, and the current state is that 
> both methods are implemented (in MGAProbeDDC(..) and MGAdoDDC(...))
> and one is used by X -configure and the other in normal use.
> 
> There are people who claim that one method upsets their system,
> while others claim that the other method doesn't work for them.
> 
> I was involved in the orginal, direct, implementation, before the VBE
> method was added (when the mga driver was the only one to support DDC).
> Since both methods work for me on my original Millennium
> I've not had any incentive to persue that matter.
> Inertia seems to have left the current state for a couple of years.

Does DDC require OS support, such as loaded I2C drivers? 

Kurt
-- 
The problem with the gene pool is that there is no lifeguard.
_______________________________________________
Xpert mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert

Reply via email to