I didn't do deep study of the API. Maybe we have already had such power. AFAIK currently, we can only manually modify each url entry to do tag combine things.
Luyi Chen
On 6/7/05, Clifford Caoile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This seems reasonable. I'll add it to the todo list.
Thank you for recognizing the issue. It is a low priority for me,
though. All I have to do is search for "\" posts" in the HTML (ah
manual screen scrape) to see if there are orphaned tags. Did you know
orphaned tags do not show "0 posts", only " posts" in the HTML?
> > I am not sure if my understanding is right. I think the idea of tag bundle
> > is to let you never change old tag names. Say you had tagname1 first, then
> > you use tagname2 at a later time for the same concept. You don't have to
> > change tagname1 to tagname2 to reflect the same idea. You just add them into
> > one tag bundle.
>
> No, tag bundles are a visual grouping so that you do not have to assign
> hierarchical names.
Still, Luyi Chen's idea is interesting. However, if tagname1 and
tagname2 are semantically similar, why would you use two tags in the
first place? Wouldn't it be better to use the tag that fits better?
Actually, my issue is that I want to use "telephone-new" instead of
"telephoneNew". This is purely a convention issue.
Thanks.
_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@del.icio.us
http://lists.del.icio.us/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@del.icio.us http://lists.del.icio.us/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
