Sejalan dengan analisa paranormal, yang hakekatnya analisa diluar logika,
berikut ini "coincidence" terjadinya penyerbuan terhadap Irak :
- That the war started at the 3rd day of the 3rd week of the 3rd month of
the 3rd year of the 3rd century/millenium.
Will its indicate :
- the start of the 3rd World War ?
- the 3rd mistake of America after the thair fails
in Gulf War I and embargo ?
- or........barangkali "weton"nya menurut hitungan
Jawa, Amerika memang angka 3.
Who knows...........
----- Original Message -----
From: "Akhmad Bukhari Saleh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Yon-I/ITB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 1:04 AM
Subject: [yonsatu] Analisis Paranormal.
> Analisis tentang Perang AS-Irak tidak ada habis-habisnya.
> Ada yang bermutu dan ada yang konyol.
> Yang konyol, tapi lucu dibacanya, adalah analisis paranormal.
> Dan ternyata di Amerika ada paranormal juga lho!
> Bedanya di sana paranormal-nya bergelar doktor (PhD), jadi lebih
> 'canggih' gayanya...
> Pernah penelitian lapangan di TimTim lagi.
>
> Wasalam.
>
> ==================================================
>
> http://www.exopolitics.org/Study-Paper2.htm
>
> An Exopolitical Perspective on the Preemptive War against Iraq
>
> Research Study #2
> February 3, 2003,
> © Dr Michael E. Salla
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------
>
> Abstract
>
> Most, if not all, criticisms of the Bush administration's motivation
> for
> launching a preemptive war on Iraq focus on a combination of the
> imperial
> world views of conservative politicians in power in Washington, D.C.,
> and
> the corporate interests that drive the political agenda of the Bush
> administration.
> This study will provide a radically different political analysis of
> the Bush
> administration's motivation for going war, and of the explanations
> offered
> by his critics.
> This study provides an exopolitical analysis of the policy dimensions
> of an
> historic extraterrestrial presence that is pertinent to Iraq and a US
> led
> preemptive attack.
> It will be argued that competing clandestine government organizations
> are
> struggling through proxy means to take control of ancient
> extraterrestrial
> (ET) technology that exists in Iraq, in order to prepare for an
> impending
> series of events corresponding to the 'prophesied return' of an
> advanced
> race of ETs.
> The Columbia Space Shuttle may well have been a high profile victim of
> such
> a proxy war intended to send a message to US based clandestine
> organizations
> over the preemptive war against Iraq.
>
> In conducting this analysis, this study examines the available
> evidence of
> an historical ET presence in Iraq, and then applies this evidence to
> better
> understand the contemporary political situation in Iraq.
> The study will then analyze the motivations of the main political
> actors in
> the prospective US led preemptive war against Iraq.
> The study concludes by making some policy recommendations concerning
> how to
> respond to the legacy of an ET presence in Iraq and its contemporary
> political relevance.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------
> ----
>
> About the Author
>
> Dr. Michael E. Salla has held academic appointments in the School of
> International Service, American University, Washington DC (1996-2001),
> and
> the Department of Political Science, Australian National University,
> Canberra, Australia (1994-96).
> He taught as an adjunct faculty member at George Washington
> University,
> Washington DC., in 2002.
> He is currently researching methods of Transformational Peace as a
> Researcher in Residence in the Center for Global Peace (2001-2003) and
> directing the Center's Peace Ambassador Program which uses
> transformational
> peace techniques for individual self-empowerment.
> He has a PhD in Government from the University of Queensland,
> Australia, and
> an MA in Philosophy from the University of Melbourne, Australia.
> He is the author of The Hero's Journey Toward a Second American
> Century
> (Greenwood Press, 2002) and author/coeditor of three other books:
> Essays on
> Peace (Central Queensland University Press, 1995); Why the Cold War
> Ended
> (Greenwood Press, 1995); and Islamic Radicalism, Muslim Nations and
> the West
> (1993).
> He has authored more than seventy articles, chapters, and book reviews
> on
> peace, ethnic conflict and conflict resolution.
> He has conducted research and fieldwork in the ethnic conflicts in
> East
> Timor, Kosovo, Macedonia, and Sri Lanka.
> He has organized a number of international workshops involving mid to
> high
> level participants from these conflicts.
> He has a personal website at www.american.edu/salla/ .
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------
> ----
>
> Introduction*
>
> In his 2003 State of the Union address President George W. Bush
> declared
> "the gravest danger facing America and the world, is outlaw regimes
> that
> seek and possess nuclear, chemical and biological weapons." (1) In his
> speech, President Bush eloquently expressed his main motivation for
> launching a preemptive war against Iraq in order to prevent "a day of
> horror
> like none we have ever known." Critics of President Bush's preemptive
> policy, including the political commentator, Robert Fisk, argue the
> upcoming
> US led war against Iraq "isn't about chemical warheads or human
> rights: it's
> about oil." (2) According to another prominent political commentator,
> Michael Lind, the motivation lies in the preemptive military doctrine
> championed by 'neo-conservatives' such as Deputy Defense Secretary
> Paul
> Wolfowitz, whose policy views were given more prominence after the
> September
> 11 attack. (3)
> Most, if not all, criticisms of the Bush administration's motivation
> for
> going to war focus on a combination of the imperial world views of
> conservative politicians in power in Washington, D.C., and the
> corporate
> interests that drive the political agenda of the Bush administration.
> This
> paper will provide a radically different political analysis of the
> Bush
> administration's motivation for going war, and of the explanations
> offered
> by his critics. It will be argued that the focus on either the factors
> supporting a preemptive war against an Iraq possessing weapons of mass
> destruction; or on criticisms against US imperialism and corporate
> interests, are not so much wrong, but simply reflect a limited
> political
> paradigm for understanding the motivations behind US foreign policy.
>
> The political paradigm to be used in this paper is based on
> 'exopolitics'.
> (4) This paradigm starts with the premise that there exists an
> extraterrestrial (ET) presence on Earth which clandestine government
> organizations have been withholding knowledge of from the general
> public and
> elected public officials. Rather than being an unsubstantiated
> 'conspiracy
> theory' with little relevance to contemporary policy issues such as a
> preemptive US war against Iraq, it will be argued that an exopolitical
> analysis can provide a more comprehensive understanding of what
> motivates
> the Bush administration in launching a preemptive attack against Iraq.
> Exopolitics as an emerging field of public policy is primarily based
> on the
> evidence provided by a range of sources supporting the idea of an ET
> presence that is known by clandestine government organizations that
> suppress
> this from the general public and elected political leaders. (5) The
> most
> important evidence comes from former military and government officials
> who
> have come forward to give 'whistle blower' testimony in a number of
> non-governmental initiatives to promote disclosure of the ET presence.
> (6)
> While many disagree over the plausibility of the available evidence
> and take
> various positions either for or against the existence of an ET
> presence and
> government non-disclosure of this presence, exopolitics is based on
> the
> premise that such debate ought not preclude discussion of the
> implications
> of such a presence among policy makers and the general public.
> Therefore
> when one examines contemporary international issue such as a US led
> preemptive war in Iraq, one can explore the viewpoints offered by
> those
> using an exopolitical analysis, and consider the plausibility of these
> for a
> more comprehensive understanding of foreign policy, irrespective of
> the
> ongoing debate over the persuasiveness of the available evidence. This
> is
> necessary since those actively involved in a non-disclosure program
> will be
> use disinformation, intimidation and other strategies to deter
> witnesses,
> distort evidence, and deter public attention from the ET presence and
> how it
> pertains to a range of contemporary policy issues. Finally, a
> clandestine
> campaign of non-disclosure needs to be considered in conducting
> exopolitical
> analysis in terms of the likelihood of this influencing and/or
> compromising
> available empirical evidence that otherwise would confirm an ET
> presence.
> Therefore, exopolitical analysis has some key differences from more
> conventional approaches to political analysis which are based on a
> traditional social scientific method of a value free, objective
> analysis of
> available processes, institutions and actors in the public policy
> arena.
>
> What follows is an exopolitical analysis of the policy dimensions of
> an
> historic ET presence that is pertinent to Iraq and a US led preemptive
> attack on the regime of Saddam Hussein. In conducting this analysis, I
> will
> first examine the available evidence of an historical ET presence in
> Iraq;
> then apply this evidence to better understand the contemporary
> political
> situation in Iraq; I will then analyze the motivations of the main
> political
> actors in the prospective US led preemptive war against Iraq; and
> finally
> conclude by making some policy recommendations.
> What's the Evidence for an historic ET presence in Iraq?
>
> The strongest available evidence for an historical ET presence in Iraq
> comes
> from cuneiform tablets directly recording the beliefs and activities
> of the
> ancient Sumerians whose civilization began almost overnight in 3800
> BC. Most
> of these cuneiform tablets relate stories of the Sumerians interacting
> with
> their 'gods'. Most archeologists initially accepted that these were
> merely
> myths and attached little importance to them other than giving insight
> into
> the mytho-religious beliefs of the ancient Sumerians. That viewpoint
> received a major challenge in 1976 when the Sumerian scholar, Zecharia
> Sitchin, published the first of a series of books on his translations
> of
> thousands of Sumerian tablets. (7) Rather than treating the stories of
> the
> gods as myths that had little empirical relevance, Sitchin interpreted
> the
> tablets as literal descriptions of events as they occurred in the
> time.
>
> Sitchin's translations of Sumerian cuneiform tablets revealed precise
> information on a range of topics that he argues could not have been
> possible
> for a civilization at the initial stages of its development with no
> obvious
> predecessor civilization to borrow from. According to Sitchin, the
> Sumerians
> had detailed knowledge of all the planets in the solar system,
> understood
> the precession of the equinoxes, and also had an understanding of
> complex
> medical procedures. (8) As to where they could have gained this
> detailed
> knowledge, Sitchin's translations suggest that the Sumerians provided
> a
> clear answer for its ultimate source. They revealed in their tablets
> that
> all their knowledge came from a race of extraterrestrial visitors the
> 'Anunnaki' ('those who from heaven to Earth came') who were not only
> teachers for the Sumerians, but also played a role in the creation of
> the
> human race. The origin of this ET race was a planet called Nibiru that
> had a
> long elliptical journey around the sun, and returned to this region of
> the
> solar system every 3,600 years. (9)
>
> When Sitchin's innovative work was first published, it raised great
> controversy and intense debate between those either for or against his
> main
> thesis of an historic ET presence in Sumer that was responsible for
> starting
> the remarkable Sumerian civilization. Among those responding favorably
> to
> Sitchin's thesis included established popular authors such as Erik Von
> Danniken who had himself written in 1969, the best selling book,
> Chariots of
> the Gods, that proposed an historic ET presence in different parts of
> the
> planet. (10) Another popular author, David Hatcher Childress, outlines
> with
> great detail the ET technology possessed by ancient civilizations in
> his
> various books. (11) Less well known authors such as William Henry have
> similarly published books supporting Sitchin's thesis. (12)
>
> To support Sitchin's thesis, many authors typically cite biblical
> texts that
> make reference to the 'gods' that resided on Earth and interacted with
> humanity. The biblical text most referred to is the apocryphal book of
> Enoch. (13) While the Book of Enoch was excluded in most versions of
> the Old
> Testament, it was nevertheless part of ancient Hebrew scholarship and
> indeed
> is included in the Ethiopian and Slavic versions of the Old Testament.
> The
> Book of Enoch describes a rebel group of angels, the 'Nephilim', who
> numbered 200, who settled the Earth and interbred with the human
> population
> before being recalled and punished by their superiors, the 'Elohim'.
> (14)
> The Book of Enoch provides contextual detail for mysterious verses in
> the
> Book of Genesis which describes a time when the 'sons of gods', the
> Nephilim/Anunnaki, interbred with humanity, and created a race of
> giants/heroes that ruled over the rest of humanity: "The Nephilim were
> on
> the earth in those days-and also afterwards-when the sons of God went
> to the
> daughters of men and had children by them. They were the heroes of
> old, men
> of renown." (15) Supporters of the Sitchin thesis say that this is
> part of
> the biblical evidence that an advanced ET race did in fact exist on
> Earth,
> had a long interaction with humanity, and even played a role in the
> creation
> of the human race.
> In addition to the growing number of authors, independent
> archaeologists and
> biblical commentators supporting Sitchin's thesis, there are a
> burgeoning
> number of individuals who claim to be in telepathic communication with
> ET
> races who reveal information on the historic ET presence in Sumer. One
> of
> these ET 'channels', is Jelaila Starr who claims to be in touch with
> beings
> from Nibiru itself, and she regularly releases online information from
> the
> Anunnaki themselves on her website. (16) Another is Sheldan Nidle who
> 'channels' an ET race from the star system Sirius gives extensive
> information on the historic presence and influence of the Anunnaki in
> his
> books and website. (17)
>
> There is great controversy over the extent to which such a disparate
> collection of evidentiary sources can substantiate the Sitchin thesis
> of an
> historic ET presence in Sumer. Despite the controversy generated by
> such
> sources, they provide a wealth of information that merits closer
> examination
> in terms of their public policy implications. Given that exopolitics
> is
> based on the premise of an ET presence that is subject to
> non-disclosure by
> clandestine government organizations, it is possible to provide an
> exopolitical perspective on Sitchin's thesis despite the ongoing
> debate over
> the consistency and accuracy of the available evidence.
>
> How Does the Historic ET presence relate to US policy in Iraq?
>
> An independent archaeologist that discusses a direct link between the
> ancient ET presence in Sumer (southern Iraq) and current US focus on
> the
> regime of Saddam Hussein, is William Henry. Henry's main thesis is
> that
> there existed in Sumerian times a technological device which he
> describes as
> a 'Stargate', that the Anunnaki/Nephilim used to travel back and forth
> from
> their homeworld and the Earth, and also how they travel around the
> galaxy.
> (18) Henry focuses on the following scene described by Sitchin's
> interpretation of a cuneiform tablet of an Uruk ritual text:
> Depictions have been found that show divine beings flanking a temple
> entrance and holding up poles to which ringlike objects are attached.
> The
> celestial nature of the scene is indicated by the inclusion of the
> symbols
> of the Sun and the Moon.... depicting Enlil and Enki flanking a
> gateway
> through which Anu is making a grand entrance. (19)
>
> Rather than a simple temple scene involving the chief Anunnaki of the
> Sumerians, Anu and his two sons, Enlil and Enki, Henry proposes that
> the
> above scene represents a transportation device used by Anu and others
> from
> the elite Anunnaki. If so, then such a device is most likely located
> in the
> Sumerian city of Uruk which was the founding city of the Sumerian
> civilization and the home of Gilgamesh, the famed king of the Epic of
> Gilgamesh. (20)
> Sitchin, and authors such as David Childress who discuss the various
> technologies used by ETs and ancient civilizations, missed the
> significance
> of the Stargate in their own translations of the above texts and
> investigations of ET transportation. Both operated in a conventional
> paradigm where transportation occurs through rocket propelled
> vehicles. (21)
> Sitchin focuses on rocket propelled spacecraft in his description of
> the
> Anunnaki and their various trips to and from the Earth. For example,
> describing the transportation used by the Anunnaki in moving between
> their
> earth and space based locations, Sitchin wrote: "The texts reveal that
> three
> hundred of them - The "Anunnaki of Heaven," or Igig- were true
> astronauts
> who stayed aboard the spacecraft without actually landing on Earth.
> Orbiting
> Earth, these spacecraft launched and received the shuttle craft to and
> from
> Earth." (22)
> It therefore can be concluded that there were two forms of
> transportation
> used by the Anunnaki. One was a form of rocket technology familiar to
> us
> which was used by the resident Anunnaki on Earth who Sitchin,
> described as
> the "rank and file Anunnaki" who administered the Earth and humanity
> according to the dictates of their space based compatriots. (23)
> Another
> transportation technology was the Stargate which presumably was used
> only by
> the highest class of Anunnaki, who dispensed the tasks of harvesting
> the
> Earth's resources to the resident and space based Anunnaki (lessor
> gods/rebel angels). Interpreting the Babylonian Epic of Creation, one
> gains
> an idea of the way tasks were allotted and the hierarchy of the
> Anunnaki in
> the way the 'supreme god' Marduk, dispensed tasks to his subordinate
> Anu,
> chief of the Anunnaki:
>
> Assigned to Anu, to heed his instructions, Three hundred in the
> heavens he
> stationed as a guard; the ways of Earth to define from the Heaven; And
> on
> Earth, Six hundred he made reside. After he all their instructions had
> ordered, to the Anunnaki of Heaven and of Earth he allotted their
> assignments. (24)
> Thus the Anunnaki operated outposts both on Earth and in Space to
> maintain
> their control over the planet. Given the strict hierarchy of authority
> described by Sitchin in his detailed analysis of the Anunnaki and
> their
> interactions with one another and humanity, it is likely that the
> Stargate
> would have been revered and a subject of awe by the resident Anunnaki
> and
> humanity who could only observe its operation but were not allowed to
> use it
> themselves. As such, there would have been only a limited number of
> Stargates around the planet, with the Sumerian Stargate being located
> in the
> most important of the ancient Sumerian cities - the most likely being
> the
> ancient capital of Uruk, home of the ancient kings, which is located
> in
> Southern Iraq. Significantly, after a 12 year lull in excavations, a
> team of
> German researchers in 2002 resumed excavations in the buried city of
> Uruk.
> Using a magnetometer which is able to detect the presence of man-made
> objects beneath the soil, and a powerful computer system in Germany,
> German
> geophysicists were able to map out the buried structures of the
> sprawling
> ancient capital of 5.5 km2 that was where Sumerian civilization began.
> (25)
>
> An important event in the Sumerian descriptions of the Anunnaki, was
> the
> latter's final departure from the planet during a series of
> cataclysmic
> events that culminated in the period 1800-1700 BC. (26) Indeed,
> conventional
> archeologists support the view that there was a regional cataclysmic
> event
> that occurred at that time. (27) If in fact there were two modes of
> transportation used by the Anunnaki, when most of the resident/lessor
> Anunnaki left by conventional rocket ships, elite Anunnaki most likely
> left
> by the Stargate and closed it down. Predictably, given the reverence
> and awe
> surrounding the Stargate, it would not have been left unprotected in
> the
> interim period between their departure and its reactivation with the
> prophesied return of the Anunnaki.
>
> A wide number of sources describe the present era in terms of a
> 'prophesied
> return of the gods/Anunnaki'. The notion of a 'prophesied return' in
> the
> context of the former Anunnaki presence varies in meaning according to
> three
> different perspectives. The first perspective is based simply on the
> idea of
> the gods or 'Anunnaki' physically returning to resume a prominent role
> in
> influencing human affairs and overseeing the use of resources of the
> planet.
> (28) In such a scenario, the first wave of Anunnaki would arrive to
> create
> the favorable conditions for the anticipated return of the Anunnaki
> elite.
> This would involve the lessor Anunnaki first returning and activating
> the
> Sumerian Stargate that would be required for the return of their
> leaders.
> Presumably, this would be heralded as a sacred event that should be
> celebrated by all humanity. The authors, Clive Prince and Lyn
> Picknett,
> argue that there has been an identifiable chain of global events
> involving
> key religious and political actors preparing humanity for just such a
> return. (29)
>
> The second perspective on the "return of the gods/Anunnaki' is the
> return of
> their home world, the planet Nibiru. Indeed, there has been much
> interest
> generated by a range of books and online web sites devoted to the
> topic of
> the return of Nibiru, the home world of the Anunnaki. Many authors
> cite a
> variety of astronomical evidence supporting the idea of a tenth planet
> that
> has long been speculated to influence the orbits of Uranus and Neptune
> ever
> since it was found that Pluto (discovered in 1930) could not account
> for
> these perturbations. In the late1970's two astronomers from the US
> Naval
> Observatory, Tom van Flandern and Richard Harrington, begun publishing
> a
> series of papers supporting the existence of a tenth planet. (30)
>
> The most widely cited reference to support the thesis of a tenth
> planet that
> is known but not released to the general public, is a series of press
> releases by the astronomical team that were searching a part of the
> sky
> which calculations by van Flandern and Harrington suggested would be
> where
> the tenth planet was. In December 1983, the chief astronomer in charge
> of
> the Infrared Astronomical Satellite (IRAS) run by the Jet Propulsion
> Laboratory, Dr Gerry Neugebauer, announced possible confirmation of
> such a
> planet. The Washington Post Reporter summarizing the announcement
> wrote:
> "[a] heavenly body possibly as large as ... Jupiter and possibly ...
> part of
> this solar system has been found in the direction of the constellation
> of
> Orion by an orbiting telescope..." (31) After a total of six major
> newspapers covered the announcement, there was a retraction of the
> announcement and public silence by astronomers on the possible
> existence of
> a tenth planet. Rumors began to emerge of an active campaign of
> suppression
> of information and intimidation by clandestine government
> organizations.
> (32) For example, one of the astronomers at the US Naval Observatory,
> Dr
> Richard Harrington, spoke publically and wrote articles on the
> hypothetical
> planet X and there has been speculation that this directly contributed
> to
> his untimely death by 'natural causes' in 1992. (33)
>
> A third perspective on what the 'prophesied return of the
> gods/Anunnaki'
> means can be found in authors who focus on the significance of the
> upcoming
> end of the current Mayan 5,200 year cycle. According to John Major
> Jenkins,
> the Mayans were aware of the way the solar ecliptic plane comes into
> alignment with the galactic plane on periodic basis. This makes it
> possible
> for more intense cosmic energies to reach the earth from the galactic
> core.
> There is then a corresponding increase or decrease in the level of
> human
> consciousness, i.e., parts of the brain either go online or off-line,
> as
> these Mayan cycles go through their different phases. According to
> Jenkins,
> the year 2012 corresponds to the end of the current Mayan cycle and
> will
> lead to a rapid transformation of global consciousness. (34) Numerous
> authors refer to this as a New Age of more enlightened global thinking
> and
> increased human potential. (35) The 'prophesied return of the gods'
> may
> therefore signify a rapid in human consciousness as dormant parts of
> the
> brain come on line when the solar ecliptic comes into alignment with
> the
> galactic plane. In this explanation, humanity itself would develop
> 'god-like' powers which spontaneously become accessible to large
> numbers of
> humanity. A number of authors, for example, have been describing the
> amazing
> abilities and psychic powers of an increasing number of children world
> wide.
> (36)
>
> In sum, the available information on the 'prophesied return of the
> gods' can
> be understood to signify an important milestone in the growth of human
> civilization. The 'prophesied return' can be interpreted either
> literally or
> metaphorically to mean either a physical return of the
> 'gods'/Anunnaki; the
> return of a mysterious 10th planet to the solar system; or a rapid
> growth in
> the consciousness of humanity as the solar plane comes into alignment
> with
> the galactic plane. Despite the controversy over what precisely such a
> 'prophesied return' signifies, the factors in such a return that most
> pertain to the current political situation in Iraq and preemptive
> military
> intervention by the US can be identified and analyzed. The first
> factor is
> that an ET transportation device, a Stargate, or some other important
> ET
> artifact, may lie buried in the desert of Southern Iraq which
> presumably
> will play a role in the 'prophesied return of the gods'. Second, it is
> possible that there will be a return of a tenth planet that plays a
> critical
> role in return of the Anunnaki and/or which significantly impacts on
> the
> global environment. Finally, there is the potential for a rapid
> acceleration
> of human consciousness as the end of the Mayan Calendar, 2012,
> approaches.
>
> Exopolitical Analysis of US policy towards Iraq
>
> If there is a Stargate existing in Southern Iraq that will play a role
> in
> such a 'prophesied return of the gods', then it is most likely that
> clandestine government organizations that greatly influence or control
> the
> Bush administration, are aware of the existence and the role of this
> Stargate. Iraq's President Hussein is most likely also aware of such a
> Stargate's existence as might be inferred by his architectural
> projects
> intent on reviving the grandeur of early Mesopotamian civilizations,
> and
> cementing his place as the restorer of Iraq's past glory. (37) More
> significantly, his permission for a German team of archaeologists to
> resume
> excavations in the Sumerian city of Uruk after detailed underground
> mapping,
> suggests that this may be the location of the Sumerian Stargate. This
> knowledge of a buried Stargate, may also be part of the reason why the
> German government has been publically opposed to a US preemptive war
> against
> Iraq. If in fact both the Hussein regime and the Bush administration
> believe
> that a Stargate lies buried in the sands of Southern Iraq, then there
> most
> likely exists a race to gain access to it and to control it. William
> Henry's
> thesis is that this is indeed the political underpinning of the
> continuing
> military conflict in Iraq. (38)
>
> >From the perspective of the Bush administration, control of the
> Sumerian
> Stargate would enable clandestine government organizations to continue
> their
> global campaign of non-disclosure of the ET presence. (39) This is
> strongly
> implied by the Bush administration's penchant for secrecy and
> overturning
> many of the Freedom of Information initiatives from the earlier
> Clinton
> administration. Control of the Stargate, in addition to any other
> Stargates
> that may have been established in the capitals of other civilizations,
> e.g.,
> the Egyptian, Incan and Aztec; would presumably give clandestine
> government
> organizations greater leverage with ET races that are presently
> interacting
> with the planet, or are predicted to arrive on the scene in some event
> associated with the 'prophesied return of the gods'. At the very
> least,
> control of the Sumerian Stargate would allow clandestine government
> organizations to dictate the pace of global transformations that ET
> races
> promise to introduce to the Earth with their advanced technology,
> superior
> knowledge and heightened psychic abilities.
>
> On the part of Hussein Regime, control of the Stargate would allow him
> to
> activate it and to fulfill prophesy by facilitating the return of an
> advanced race of ETs, the elite Anunnaki. President Hussein probably
> imagines that in return for his loyalty to the elite Anunnaki, he
> would be
> rewarded with a position of great global authority. Perhaps he would
> even
> see himself as some kind of human savior facilitating the return of
> the gods
> who would solve all of humanity's problem, and end the rule of
> clandestine
> government organizations perpetuating non-disclosure of the ET
> presence.
> Significantly, European governments such as Germany, and perhaps even
> France
> and Russia, may be giving themselves greater leverage in the future
> control
> of the Stargate by offering diplomatic cover for the Hussein regime as
> a
> quid pro quo for allowing the resumption of archaeological digging in
> Uruk.
> These governments and the clandestine organizations associated with
> them
> that have access to knowledge over the ET presence, most likely have
> deep
> suspicion over the willingness of the US to share information and
> control
> over the future of the Sumerian Stargate and any other ET technology
> discovered in Iraq.
>
> Sitchin's thesis of an ancient ET presence in Sumer combined with the
> notion
> of a variety of ET transportation devices described by other authors
> in
> their research of ancient civilizations, and resumption of
> archaeological
> excavations of the first Sumerian capital Uruk in 2002, give support
> to
> William Henry's thesis of a Stargate that lies buried in the sands of
> southern Iraq. This provides important contextual information that is
> helpful in understanding the true motivations of the Bush
> administration in
> launching a preemptive attack on Iraq.
>
> It may be argued that the Bush administration and the Hussein Regime
> are
> both in a race against time to gain access and control of the Stargate
> in
> the ruins of Uruk or some other location in Iraq, before the
> prophesied
> return of the Anunnaki. At the moment, a stalemate exists. Hussein
> controls
> the ground in Southern Iraq, and is permitting the German led
> excavations in
> Uruk, while the US led coalition controls the sky and is monitoring
> the
> situation. The Bush administration wants control of Iraq territory to
> take
> control of excavations of Uruk to uncover its buried Stargate, and
> closely
> monitor and control it. In contrast, Hussein wants to find and
> activate the
> Stargate for his greater glory and presumably the benefit of humanity.
>
> The primary evidentiary support for the above discussion is admittedly
> thin
> for conventional public policy experts and may sound better suited to
> a
> fictional thriller than serious public debate. From a conventional
> perspective, a scattered assortment of independent archeological
> authors,
> radical exegetical interpretations of biblical texts, the writings of
> 'channels' of ET knowledge, speculative papers from astronomers hardly
> constitute a persuasive source of information for understanding the
> motivations of US foreign policy. The prevailing explanations of a
> Bush
> administration as either devoted to eradicating Weapons of Mass
> Destruction,
> and/or being driven by oil interests and imperial ambitions would
> predictably prevail for those unconvinced by the above sources.
>
> There is however some important circumstantial evidence which lends
> plausibility to the Henry thesis of a Stargate as the true focus of
> the Bush
> administration or at least key interest groups behind it. The first
> piece of
> circumstantial evidence, are the overwhelming whistleblower
> testimonies
> confirming the existence of clandestine government organizations
> responsible
> for suppressing public knowledge of an ET presence, and which controls
> all
> official interaction with ET races. (40) From an exopolitical
> perspective,
> then, the clandestine suppression of a contemporary ET presence,
> supports
> the conclusion that there is also an active clandestine suppression of
> an
> ancient ET presence which also has significant public policy
> implications.
>
> The second piece of circumstantial evidence, is the powerful
> diplomatic
> support given by Germany and France to the Hussein Regime in warding
> off a
> preemptive military strike. So powerful has been this support, that
> the US
> Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, disparagingly referred to them
> as the
> "Old Europe" in response to a reporter on January 22, 2003:
>
> "You're thinking of Europe as Germany and France. I don't. I think
> that's
> 'old Europe.' If you look at the entire NATO Europe today, the center
> of
> gravity is shifting to the East. And there are a lot of new members.
> And if
> you just take the list of all the members of NATO and all of those who
> have
> been invited in recently -- what is it, 26, something like that? [But]
> you're right. Germany has been a problem, and France has been a
> problem."
> (41)
>
> Rather than backtracking on what was a diplomatic bombshell, the Bush
> administration has instead continued to go to extraordinary lengths to
> isolate the German and French positions on Iraq. For example, the
> administration encouraged the leaders of Spain, Portugal, Italy, the
> United
> Kingdom, Hungary, Poland, Denmark and the Czech Republic, to write a
> letter
> to the Wall Street Journal on January 30 that said ``the Iraqi regime
> and
> its weapons of mass destruction represent a clear threat to world
> security.'' (42) Rather than merely an intense diplomatic debate over
> different policy positions on Iraq, the striking language and
> positions
> taken in this debate suggests a more fundamental conflict over issues
> hidden
> from the public view. It is likely that there exists a factional
> struggle
> between clandestine government organizations set up to deal with the
> ET
> presence in the US, with rival organizations created in Germany,
> France and
> also Russia.
>
> The third piece of circumstantial evidence is the resumption of
> excavations
> of the first capital of Sumer, Uruk, by a German archeological team in
> 2002.
> Given the prominence of Uruk and its likelihood as the site for a
> Sumerian
> Stargate, then resumption of excavations raises questions over why
> they were
> resumed at this time and what is being sought. Given that political
> tensions
> in Iraq had not significantly diminished in 2002 with it being a
> likely
> source of future military conflict with the US, it can be suggested
> that
> there are powerful hidden motivations for what on the surface appears
> to be
> a purely scientific dig of an ancient Sumerian capital.
>
> The fourth piece of circumstantial evidence was the destruction of the
> Space
> Shuttle Columbia during its final descent on February 1, 2003, at an
> approximate height of 38 miles and travelling at Mach 18. One of the
> astronauts was the first Israeli in Space, Colonel IIan Ramon from the
> Israeli Airforce. Col Ramon reportedly played a role in the Israeli
> attack
> on Iraq's nuclear facility in Osirak in June 1981, and there has been
> speculation that his mission involved intelligence gathering over Iraq
> during the Shuttle's orbits. The destruction of Columbia occurred 16
> minutes
> before touch down when its fuel tanks would have been virtually empty.
> A
> likely source of the Shuttle's destruction, given the speed and height
> of
> the Columbia, would have been some form of attack from an organization
> or
> state possessing military capabilities well beyond any terrorist
> groups and
> indeed most nations. The likely cause would have been a clandestine
> government organization that desired to send an important message to
> its US
> rivals over the threatened preemptive attack on Iraq.
>
> When all the primary and circumstantial evidence is put together, what
> emerges is a very plausible case that supports Henry's thesis of a
> power
> struggle that goes to the heart of the ET presence and the continued
> clandestine suppression of ET related information and its full
> implications.
> The interpretations of the motivations of the Bush administration in
> launching preemptive war on Iraq in terms of the concerns raised in
> Bush's
> 2003 State of the Union address, or the corporate and imperial
> interests
> suggested by his critics such as Robert Fisk and Michael Lind, can all
> be
> described as part of the surface layer of motivations driving the Bush
> administration. At a deeper level, it is likely that there is great
> anxiety
> by clandestine government organizations in terms of what would happen
> if
> Hussein, with the support of the German and other European
> governments,
> gained access to the Sumerian Stargate or other ET technology buried
> in
> Uruk, or if the Stargate were to somehow reactivate without
> clandestine
> government personnel present to monitor and control the Stargate.
> President
> Bush's State of the Union address outlining the need for a preemptive
> attack
> on Iraq, in most likelihood masks a hidden agenda to gain access to
> the
> Stargate or other ET technology in Uruk and elsewhere in Iraq. Such
> access
> would presumably perpetuate clandestine government control over global
> resources and information at a time of increased ET activity and
> influence.
>
> Conclusion: Policy Implications and Recommendations
>
> If the exopolitical perspective is a more accurate description of the
> motivations driving the Bush administration in pushing for a
> preemptive war
> on Iraq, then the following policy recommendations can be made. (43)
> First,
> the quality of evidence substantiating an historic ET presence and
> clandestine government cover up has a significant degree of
> credibility and
> persuasiveness. This supports the creation a new field of public
> policy,
> exopolitics, which would study the historic ET presence in terms of
> its
> implications for contemporary public policy.
>
> Second, there is a need to promote official government disclosure of
> the
> historic ET presence and/or the impending return of these ETs; and to
> make
> more representative the policy making process that has evolved in
> government
> responses to such information.
>
> Third, evidence suggests that the present military preparations for a
> war
> against Iraq have little to do with weapons of mass destruction, but
> are
> designed to perpetuate US clandestine government control of
> information
> concerning the historic and present ET presence. Such a preemptive war
> should therefore be stopped and a resolution between the US, Iraq and
> interested European governments should be encouraged.
>
> Fourth, evidence suggests that the Iraq conflict and the destruction
> of the
> Columbia Space Shuttle mask a deep factional struggle between
> clandestine
> government organizations associated with different national
> governments that
> were initially created to deal with the ET presence. It is recommended
> that
> there is public disclosure of these organizations and their efforts in
> monitoring and responding to the ET presence, and that these
> organizations
> become accountable to elected public officials.
>
> The final policy recommendation is that there needs to be more effort
> in
> determining the extent to which congressional and legislative
> oversight is
> required for organizations created in different countries to deal with
> all
> aspects of the ET presence, both past and present, and on the
> implications
> of a projected return of a race of ETs associated with the birth of
> human
> civilization.
>
> This paper suggests that the best mechanism for responding to the
> existence
> of ancient ET technology in the ancient Sumerian capital of Uruk
> and/or
> elsewhere, is a willingness by major world governments and associated
> clandestine organizations to share information and control over these
> ET
> assets. A preemptive war conducted largely for the control of a
> 'Stargate'
> in Uruk which pits the US and its allies, against an Iraq which is
> tacitly
> supported by key European nations, could be calamitous if indeed the
> 'prophesied return' signified an actual physical event involving the
> ancient
> ET race that played a role in the start of human civilization.
> Competing
> clandestine government organizations struggling through a proxy war
> over the
> control of ancient ET technology in order to prepare for those events
> corresponding to the 'prophesied return of the gods', would hardly
> send the
> best example of a mature humanity responsible enough to continue to
> exercise
> sovereignty over the Earth's resources. The Columbia Space Shuttle may
> well
> have been a high profile victim of such a proxy war intended to send a
> message to US based clandestine organizations over the preemptive war
> against Iraq. .Human sovereignty may therefore be at stake at the very
> time
> where there exists an opportunity for a rapid movement forward in the
> evolutionary growth of human consciousness. It is up to all humanity
> to
> decide how we respond to the challenge posed by clandestine
> organizations
> struggling over Iraq's historic resources to further their respective
> secret
> agendas.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------
> ----
>
> ENDNOTES
>
> I would like to thank my good friend Yazdi Kaleghi for his insights on
> the
> Columbia Space Shuttle tragedy and the contents of this Study.
> 1. For the full text of his January 28, 2003, State of the Union
> Address, go
> to http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/01/20030128-19.html
>
> 2. Robert Fisk, "This looming war isn't about chemical warheads or
> human
> rights: it's about oil," The Independent 18 January, 2003.
> http://www.independent.co.uk/story.jsp?story=370328
>
> 3. See Michael Lind, Made In Texas: George W. Bush and the Southern
> Takeover
> of American Politics (Basic Books, 2002)
>
> 4. For an introduction to exopolitics, see Michael Salla, "The Need
> for
> Exopolitics: Implications of Extraterrestrial Conspiracy Theories for
> Policy
> Makers and Global Peace," www.exopolitics.org, January 20, 2003.
>
> 5. For more discussion on Exopolitics see, Michael Salla, "The Need
> for
> Exopolitics" www.exopolitics.org
>
> 6. 100 of this officials have already given testimony, with another
> 300
> willing to do so. See Stephen Greer, Executive Summary of the
> Disclosure
> Project (Crozet, VA.: Disclosure Project, April 2001). Website:
> www.disclosureproject.com
>
> 7. Zecharia Sitchin, The Earth Chronicles, Books 1-6 (New York: Avon
> Books)
>
> 8. See his chapter, "The Sudden Civilization," The 12th Planet: Book 1
> of
> the Earth Chronicles(Avon Books, 1976) 12-51.
>
> 9. Sitchin discusses this planet in, The 12th Planet: Book 1of the
> Earth
> Chronicles (Avon, 1976).
>
> 10. Erich von Daniken, Chariots of the Gods (New York: G.P. Putnam's
> Sons,
> 1969).
>
> 11. David Hatcher Childress, Technology of the Gods: The Incredible
> Sciences
> of the Ancients, (Adventures Unlimited Press, 2000).
>
> 12. William Henry, One Foot in Atlantis. (Earthpulse Press, 1998).
>
> 13. An online version of the Book of Enoch can be found at
> http://wesley.nnu.edu/noncanon/ot/pseudo/enoch.htm
>
> 14. Sitchin describes the Sumerian version of this event in "Mutiny of
> the
> Anunnaki," The 12th Planet, 312-335.
>
> 15. Holy Bible: New International Version (Hodder and Stoughton, 1978)
> Genesis, Book 6, verse 4.
>
> 16. Jelaila Starr, We Are the Nibiruans: Return of the 12th Planet
> (New Leaf
> Distributing Co., 1999). Website: http://www.nibiruancouncil.com/
>
> 17. Sheldan Nidle, First Contact (Vancouver: Blue Lodge Press, 2000).
> Website: www.paoweb.com
>
> 18. Henry outlines his thesis in his article, "Saddam Hussein, The
> Stairway
> to Heaven and the Return of Planet X" which is available on his
> website
> www.williamhenry.net . This is based on his book Ark of the Christos:
> The
> Mythology, Symbolism and Prophecy of the Return of Planet X and the
> Age of
> Terror, both of which are available from his website:
> www.williamhenry.net
>
> 19. Sitchin, When Time Began: Book V of the Earth Chronicles (Avon,
> 1993)
> 113-14.
>
> 20. In contrast Henry believes that the Stargate was buried in some
> secret
> location by the Bablyonian king, Nebuchadnezzar, after having been
> re-taken
> from Jerusalem. Saddam Hussein, The Stairway to Heaven and the Return
> of
> Planet X" which is available on his website www.williamhenry.net
>
> 21. Sitchin describes the transportation of the Nefilim/Anunnakin, in
> his
> chapter, "The Nefilim: People of the Fiery Rockets," The 12th Planet,
> 128-72. See also Childress' chapter on "Ancient Flight and Aerial
> Warfare,"
> Extraterrestrial Archeology, 147-210.
>
> 22. Sitchin, The 12th Planet, 327
>
> 23. Sitchin, The 12th Planet, 327
>
> 24. Sitchin, The 12th Planet, 327
>
> 25. For description of the resumption of archeological digs in Iraq,
> see
> Charles Recknagel, "Iraq: Archaeological Expedition Mapping Ancient
> City Of
> Uruk," Radio Free Europe, May 3.
> http://www.rferl.org/nca/features/2002/05/03052002101632.asp
>
> 26. Sitchin describes these events in the third volume of his Earth
> Chronicles series, The Wars of Gods and Men (Avon, 1999)
>
> 27. For reference to this regional disaster, see an article by the
> Chief
> Archeologist from the University of Chicago, Prof McGuire Gibson,
> "Nippur -
> Sacred City of Enlil Supreme God of Sumer and Akkad." First published
> in
> Al-Rafidan, Vol. XIV (1993 ) and made available online at at
> http://asmar.uchicago.edu/OI/PROJ/NIP/PUB93/NSC/NSC.html
>
> 28. Such a view is described by a number of 'channels' including
> Sheldan
> Nidle, First Contact; and Jelaila Star, We are the Niburuans. Their
> respective websites are www.paoweb.net and www.niburuancouncil.net
>
> 29. Lynn Picknett & Clive Prince, The Stargate Conspiracy: The Truth
> About
> Extraterrestrial Life and the Mysteries of Ancient Egypt (Berkley
> Books,
> 1999)
>
> 30. For the history of astronomical searches for Planet X, see William
> Graves Hoyt: Planet X and Pluto, (The University of Arizona Press
> 1980),
> Mark Littman: Planets Beyond - discovering the outer solar system,
> (John
> Wiley 1988); and Tom van Flandern, Dark Matter, Missing Planets & New
> Comets. Paradoxes resolved, origins illuminated (North Atlantic Books
> 1993).
>
> 31. Thomas O'Toole, "Mystery Heavenly Body Discovered: Possibly as
> Large as
> Jupiter," Washington Post (December 31, 1983).
>
> 32. See Mark Hazlewood, Blindsided: Planet X Passes in 2003,
> (Firstpublish
> LLC, 2001). Hazlewood maintains a website with online excepts
> outlining
> clandestine goverment suppression of the coming of Planet X,
> http://www.planetx2003.com/index.html
>
> 33. See Hazlewood, Blindsided: Planet X Passes in 2003. Website:
> http://www.planetx2003.com/index.html
>
> 34. Jenkins is author of Maya Cosmogenesis 2012 (Santa Fe: Bear and
> Co.,
> 1998); and Galactic Alignment: The Transformation of Consciousness
> According
> to Mayan, Egyptian, and Vedic Traditions (Inner Traditions
> International,
> 2002).
>
> 35. One of the first to identify this upcoming transition was Jose
> Arguelles
> and Brian Swimme, The Mayan Factor: Path Beyond Technology (Bear and
> Co.,
> 1987)
>
> 36. See Lee Carroll and Jan Tober, The Indigo Children: The New Kids
> Have
> Arrived (Hay House, 1999); and Drunvalo Melchizidek, The Ancient
> Secret of
> the Flower of Life (Light Technology Publications, 2000) Vol 2,
> 443-54.
>
> 37. Henry discusses these projects in Ark of the Christos.
>
> 38. Henry outlines this in his article, "Saddam Hussein, The Stairway
> to
> Heaven and the Return of Planet X" which is available on his website
> www.williamhenry.net .
>
> 39. For more discussion of this non-disclosure, see M. Salla, "The
> Need for
> Exopolitics."
>
> 40. See Salla, "The Need for Exopolitics."
>
> 41. For discussion of Rumsfeld's comments and the French/German
> response,
> see Mark Baker, "Rumsfeld's 'Old' And 'New' Europe Touches On Uneasy
> Divide," Radio Free Europe, 24 January, 2003. Website:
> http://www.rferl.org/nca/features/2003/01/24012003172118.asp
>
> 42. Wall Street Journal. Jan 30, 2003.
>
> 43. See Salla, "The Need for Exopolitics."
>
>
>
> --[YONSATU -
ITB]----------------------------------------------------------
> Online archive : <http://yonsatu.mahawarman.net>
> Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Unsubscribe : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Vacation : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
--[YONSATU - ITB]----------------------------------------------------------
Online archive : <http://yonsatu.mahawarman.net>
Moderators : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unsubscribe : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vacation : <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
