On Dec 20, 2006, at 04:41, Darren J Moffat wrote:

Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
There also may be a reason to do this when confidentiality isn't
required: as a sparse provisioning hack..
If you were to build a zfs pool out of compressed zvols backed by
another pool, then it would be very convenient if you could run in a
mode where freed blocks were overwritten by zeros when they were freed, because this would permit the underlying compressed zvol to free *its*
blocks.

A very interesting observation. Particularly given that I have just created such a configuration - with iSCSI in the "middle".

over ipsec? wow - how many layers is that before you start talking to the real (non-psuedo) block storage device?

---
.je
_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to