Rainer Heilke wrote On 01/17/07 15:44,:
It turns out we're probably going to go the UFS/ZFS route, with 4 filesystems (the DB files on
> UFS with Directio).
It seems that the pain of moving from a single-node ASM to a RAC'd ASM is great, and not worth it.
> The DBA group decided doing the migration to UFS for the DB files now, and > then to a RAC'd ASM later, will end up being the easiest, safest route.
Rainer Still curious as to if and when this bug will get fixed...
If you're referring to bug 6413510 that Anantha mentioned then my earlier post today answered that: > This problem was fixed in snv_48 last September and will be > in S10_U4. Neil _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
