Jason J. W. Williams writes:
 > Hi Guys,
 > 
 > Rather than starting a new thread I thought I'd continue this thread.
 > I've been running Build 54 on a Thumper since Mid January and wanted
 > to ask a question about the zfs_arc_max setting. We set it to "
 > 0x100000000 #4GB", however its creeping over that till our Kernel
 > memory usage is nearly 7GB (::memstat inserted below).
 > 
 > This is a database server so I was curious if the DNLC would have this
 > affect over time, as it does quite quickly when dealing with small
 > files? Would it be worth upgrade to Build 59?
 > 

Another possibility is that, there is a portion of memory
that might be in the kmem caches, ready to be reclaimed and
returned to the OS free space. Such reclaims currently only
occurs on memory shortage. I think we should do it under
some more conditions...

This might fall under:

  CrNumber: 6416757
  Synopsis: zfs should return memory eventually
  http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6416757

If you induce some  temporary memory  pressure, it would  be
nice to see if you're kernel shrinks down to ~4GB.

-r


 > Thank you in advance!
 > 
 > Best Regards,
 > Jason
 > 
 > Page Summary                Pages                MB  %Tot
 > ------------     ----------------  ----------------  ----
 > Kernel                    1750044              6836   42%
 > Anon                      1211203              4731   29%
 > Exec and libs                7648                29    0%
 > Page cache                 220434               861    5%
 > Free (cachelist)           318625              1244    8%
 > Free (freelist)            659607              2576   16%
 > 
 > Total                     4167561             16279
 > Physical                  4078747             15932
 > 
 > 
 > On 3/23/07, Roch - PAE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
 > >
 > > With latest Nevada setting zfs_arc_max in /etc/system is
 > > sufficient. Playing with mdb on a live system is more
 > > tricky and is what caused the problem here.
 > >
 > > -r
 > >
 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 > >  > Jim Mauro wrote:
 > >  >
 > >  > > All righty...I set c_max to 512MB, c to 512MB, and p to 256MB...
 > >  > >
 > >  > >  > arc::print -tad
 > >  > > {
 > >  > >  ...
 > >  > >     ffffffffc02e29e8 uint64_t size = 0t299008
 > >  > >     ffffffffc02e29f0 uint64_t p = 0t16588228608
 > >  > >     ffffffffc02e29f8 uint64_t c = 0t33176457216
 > >  > >     ffffffffc02e2a00 uint64_t c_min = 0t1070318720
 > >  > >     ffffffffc02e2a08 uint64_t c_max = 0t33176457216
 > >  > > ...
 > >  > > }
 > >  > >  > ffffffffc02e2a08 /Z 0x20000000
 > >  > > arc+0x48:       0x7b9789000             =       0x20000000
 > >  > >  > ffffffffc02e29f8 /Z 0x20000000
 > >  > > arc+0x38:       0x7b9789000             =       0x20000000
 > >  > >  > ffffffffc02e29f0 /Z 0x10000000
 > >  > > arc+0x30:       0x3dcbc4800             =       0x10000000
 > >  > >  > arc::print -tad
 > >  > > {
 > >  > > ...
 > >  > >     ffffffffc02e29e8 uint64_t size = 0t299008
 > >  > >     ffffffffc02e29f0 uint64_t p = 0t268435456              <------ p
 > >  > > is 256MB
 > >  > >     ffffffffc02e29f8 uint64_t c = 0t536870912              <------ c
 > >  > > is 512MB
 > >  > >     ffffffffc02e2a00 uint64_t c_min = 0t1070318720
 > >  > >     ffffffffc02e2a08 uint64_t c_max = 0t536870912    <------- c_max is
 > >  > > 512MB
 > >  > > ...
 > >  > > }
 > >  > >
 > >  > > After a few runs of the workload ...
 > >  > >
 > >  > >  > arc::print -d size
 > >  > > size = 0t536788992
 > >  > >  >
 > >  > >
 > >  > >
 > >  > > Ah - looks like we're out of the woods. The ARC remains clamped at 
 > > 512MB.
 > >  >
 > >  >
 > >  > Is there a way to set these fields using /etc/system?
 > >  > Or does this require a new or modified init script to
 > >  > run and do the above with each boot?
 > >  >
 > >  > Darren
 > >  >
 > >  > _______________________________________________
 > >  > zfs-discuss mailing list
 > >  > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
 > >  > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
 > >
 > > _______________________________________________
 > > zfs-discuss mailing list
 > > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
 > > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
 > >
 > _______________________________________________
 > zfs-discuss mailing list
 > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
 > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to