I've since stopped making the second clone when I realized the .zfs/snapshot/<snapname> still exists after the clone operation is completed. So my need for the local clone is met by the direct access to the snapshot.
However, the poor performance of the destroy is still valid. It is quite possible that we might create another clone for reasons beyond my original reason. Why is the destroy so slow with the second clone in play? Thanks. This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
