>On June 13, 2007 11:26:07 PM -0400 Ed Ravin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:42:26PM -0400, Ed Ravin wrote:
>>> As mentioned before, NetBSD's scandir(3) implementation was one.  The
>>> NetBSD project has fixed this in their CVS.  OpenBSD and FreeBSD's
>>> scandir() looks like another, I'll have to drop them a line.
>>
>> I heard from an OpenBSD developer who is working on a patch, but he hasn't
>> got a ZFS filesystem to test against.
>
>He doesn't need one.  He can just change OpenBSD's ufs (or whatever fs he
>wishes to use) to plug in random small numbers for st_size instead of
>what it does now.  He could even do this on a 2nd system which exports
>via NFS, to isolate the code under test.


Or just start the code of with st_size /= 24


Casper

_______________________________________________
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss

Reply via email to