On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 6:55 AM, Robert Milkowski <mi...@task.gda.pl> wrote: > It definitely does. I made some tests today comparing b101 with b105 while > doing 'zfs send -R -I A B >/dev/null' with several dozen snapshots between A > and B. Well, b105 is almost 5x faster in my case - that's pretty good. > > -- > Robert Milkowski > http://milek.blogspot.com > -- > This message posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > zfs-discuss mailing list > zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss >
Sad to report that I am seeing the slow zfs recv issue cropping up again while running b105 :( Not sure what has triggered the change, but I am seeing the same behavior again: massive amounts of reads on the receiving side, while only receiving just tiny bursts of data amounting to a mere megabyte a second. It doesn't seem to happen every single time though which is odd, but I can provoke it by destroying a snapshot from the pool I am sending, then taking another snapshot and re-sending it. It seems to cause the receiving side to go into this "read storm" before any data is transferred. I'm going to open a case in the morning, and see if I can't get an engineer to look at this. -- Brent Jones br...@servuhome.net _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
