Hi, snv_123, x64
zfs recv -F complains it can't open a snapshot it just destroyed itself as it was destroyed on a sending side. Other than complaining about it it finishes successfully. Below is an example where I created a filesystem fs1 with three snapshots of it called snap1, snap2, snap3. Next I replicated snap1 to different location. Then I did incremental replication between snap1 and snap2. Then destroyed snap1 on a source. Then did incremental replication between snap2 and snap3 with zfs recv -F which should also replicate a destroying of snap1 which it did. But at the same time it complains it can't open snap1 just after it destroyed it itself. Seems like it is entirely harmless still it shouldn't happen. <pre> > zfs create archive-2/test > zfs create archive-2/test/fs1 > zfs snapshot archive-2/test/f...@snap1 > zfs snapshot archive-2/test/f...@snap2 > zfs snapshot archive-2/test/f...@snap3 > zfs create archive-2/test/repl > zfs send -R archive-2/test/f...@snap1 | zfs recv -vdF archive-2/test/repl receiving full stream of archive-2/test/f...@snap1 into archive-2/test/repl/test/f...@snap1 received 249KB stream in 14 seconds (17.8KB/sec) > > zfs send -R -I archive-2/test/f...@snap1 archive-2/test/f...@snap2 | zfs recv > -vdF archive-2/test/repl receiving incremental stream of archive-2/test/f...@snap2 into archive-2/test/repl/test/f...@snap2 received 312B stream in 1 seconds (312B/sec) > > zfs destroy archive-2/test/f...@snap1 > zfs send -R -I archive-2/test/f...@snap2 archive-2/test/f...@snap3 | zfs recv > -vdF archive-2/test/repl attempting destroy archive-2/test/repl/test/f...@snap1 success cannot open 'archive-2/test/repl/test/f...@snap1': dataset does not exist receiving incremental stream of archive-2/test/f...@snap3 into archive-2/test/repl/test/f...@snap3 received 312B stream in 1 seconds (312B/sec) > > zfs list -t all -r archive-2/test NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT archive-2/test 266K 7.35T 56.1K /archive-2/test archive-2/test/fs1 51.2K 7.35T 51.2K /archive-2/test/fs1 archive-2/test/f...@snap2 0 - 51.2K - archive-2/test/f...@snap3 0 - 51.2K - archive-2/test/repl 158K 7.35T 53.6K /archive-2/test/repl archive-2/test/repl/test 105K 7.35T 53.6K /archive-2/test/repl/test archive-2/test/repl/test/fs1 51.2K 7.35T 51.2K /archive-2/test/repl/test/fs1 archive-2/test/repl/test/f...@snap2 0 - 51.2K - archive-2/test/repl/test/f...@snap3 0 - 51.2K - > so everything was replicated as expected. However zfs recv -F should not complain that it can't open snap1. </pre> -- Robert Milkowski http://milek.blogspot.com -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
