Yeah, but sometimes it makes the bad party more relevant, like I went to a party in 1983, by the time I stopped it was 1994, and although the party and all the people looked totally out-dated, when we told the hospital the year they said it was cool because they could see how i ended up like this...
-----Original Message----- From: Brendan Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2003 1:41 a.m. To: Ralf Gill; ::); [email protected] Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic) That's not relevant! As we all know, there are just good parties and bad parties. Discussing when they actually happen is fuggin geeked out... :) | -----Original Message----- | From: Ralf Gill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sent: 18 February 2003 12:42 | To: '::)'; '[email protected]' | Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic) | | | | | -----Original Message----- | From: ::) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2003 1:40 a.m. | To: 313 Mailing List | Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic) | | | | This party, what year was it ? | | | >ok so hi | | >we should end this and talk about something else. | | what about the new hawtin and vath album? I never heard | anyone talk about | it | | anyone wanna have a party? | | | -Joe | | | ----- Original Message ----- | From: "Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | To: "Odeluga, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "James Bucknell" | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "313 Mailing List" | <[email protected]> | Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:29 AM | Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations | | | > Well, maybe there is an interesting point here. Do tracks just stand | alone, | > without any context in time? I personally like to know when | a track was | > done, it gives me an idea of how the artist was affected by | the scene | > surrounding them, and the influences that are at play. | > | > I have tracks that are wicked for the time, but now sound a a little | dated. | > They still retain some of their original power, but now | can be seen as | > important advances for their respective times. Maybe the | dispute arose | over | > listing years that are quite recent? Seeing tracklistings | with (2001), | > (2000), or (1998) in them might look overly anal, but still | I like to | trace | > an artist's development, so for me it's important information. | > | > Just my tuppence, | > | > Andrew | > | > | > ----- Original Message ----- | > From: "Odeluga, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > To: "James Bucknell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "313 | > Mailing List" <[email protected]> | > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 12:16 PM | > Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations | > | > | > > Now we are going to argue about putting years of tracks | on tracklists, | or | > > not - I had thought I'd seen the further limits of | triviality on this | > list, | > > till now!! | > > | > > ¦-D | > > | > > >-----Original Message----- | > > >From: James Bucknell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | > > >Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 4:12 AM | > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313 Mailing List | > > >Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations | > > > | > > > | > > >the reason for putting the year of release in a track | listing is the | same | > > >reason that track listings mention the artist, title, | record label and | > mix. | > > >it's information that is useful for those that want to | track it down. | > > >james | > > > | > > > | > > >> | | > > >> | | > > >> | > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | > > >> | > Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 07:29:39 -0500 | > > >> | > To: [email protected] | > > >> | > Subject: (313) playlists and conversations | > > >> | > | > > >> | > For the person giving the years on his playlists, | isnt that very | > > >> | > fuggin geeked out? and all these techno | conversation about what | is | > > >> | > techno, they all suck. Go to Submerge or | something and ask mike | > > >> | > banks. The basic fact is there is good music | and bad, and | > > >> | > acoustic music and electronic music. Thats it. | Cant you guys go | > > >> | > back to talking about new records and old | records????? what is | this | > > >> | > shiznit? You guys bore everyone! And of course | Missy Elliot is | at | > > >> | > least a little techno. That isnt just hand drums | behind her | > > >> | > vocals. And Adam beyer is also techno, its just | pounding. Its | > > >> | > obviously not Rhythim is Rhythim , but no | disrespect. Id rather | > > >> | > use this list to find out dj dates for Derrick May | or any other | > > >> | > non-half-azzed dj, so if anybody knows, where and | when is Derrick | > > >> | > playing, in the US or abroad??? And everybody quit | the shiznit, | > > >> | > save it for your toilets | > > >> | | > > >> | | > > >> | > > > | > |
