LOL. that's more like it. discussing a geek's party is quite geeky in itself. and as we all know there are good discussions and bad discussions. (2003)
Rob Jarvis Victoria Music Ltd. Unit 215 old gramaphone works 326 Kensal Road London W10 5BZ + 44 (0)20 7565 8193 voice + 44 (0)20 8960 3834 fax http://www.victoria-music.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MSN messenger) pro-jex + killa bite + inform + subvoice + room tone + housedust + nepenta + u7 + kne' deep + rodeo meat + response audio + sounds unique + hypercubic + radio sonic + neon + feedback > From: Ralf Gill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 01:49:18 +1300 > To: "'Brendan Nelson'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "'[email protected]'" > <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic) > > Yeah, but sometimes it makes the bad party more relevant, like I went to a > party in 1983, by the time I stopped it was 1994, and although the party and > all the people looked totally out-dated, when we told the hospital the year > they said it was cool because they could see how i ended up like this... > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brendan Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2003 1:41 a.m. > To: Ralf Gill; ::); [email protected] > Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic) > > > That's not relevant! As we all know, there are just good parties and bad > parties. Discussing when they actually happen is fuggin geeked out... :) > > | -----Original Message----- > | From: Ralf Gill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > | Sent: 18 February 2003 12:42 > | To: '::)'; '[email protected]' > | Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic) > | > | > | > | > | -----Original Message----- > | From: ::) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > | Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2003 1:40 a.m. > | To: 313 Mailing List > | Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic) > | > | > | > | This party, what year was it ? > | > | > | >ok so hi > | > | >we should end this and talk about something else. > | > | what about the new hawtin and vath album? I never heard > | anyone talk about > | it > | > | anyone wanna have a party? > | > | > | -Joe > | > | > | ----- Original Message ----- > | From: "Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | To: "Odeluga, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "James Bucknell" > | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "313 Mailing List" > | <[email protected]> > | Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:29 AM > | Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations > | > | > | > Well, maybe there is an interesting point here. Do tracks just stand > | alone, > | > without any context in time? I personally like to know when > | a track was > | > done, it gives me an idea of how the artist was affected by > | the scene > | > surrounding them, and the influences that are at play. > | > > | > I have tracks that are wicked for the time, but now sound a a little > | dated. > | > They still retain some of their original power, but now > | can be seen as > | > important advances for their respective times. Maybe the > | dispute arose > | over > | > listing years that are quite recent? Seeing tracklistings > | with (2001), > | > (2000), or (1998) in them might look overly anal, but still > | I like to > | trace > | > an artist's development, so for me it's important information. > | > > | > Just my tuppence, > | > > | > Andrew > | > > | > > | > ----- Original Message ----- > | > From: "Odeluga, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | > To: "James Bucknell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "313 > | > Mailing List" <[email protected]> > | > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 12:16 PM > | > Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations > | > > | > > | > > Now we are going to argue about putting years of tracks > | on tracklists, > | or > | > > not - I had thought I'd seen the further limits of > | triviality on this > | > list, > | > > till now!! > | > > > | > > ¦-D > | > > > | > > >-----Original Message----- > | > > >From: James Bucknell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > | > > >Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 4:12 AM > | > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313 Mailing List > | > > >Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations > | > > > > | > > > > | > > >the reason for putting the year of release in a track > | listing is the > | same > | > > >reason that track listings mention the artist, title, > | record label and > | > mix. > | > > >it's information that is useful for those that want to > | track it down. > | > > >james > | > > > > | > > > > | > > >> | > | > > >> | > | > > >> | > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > | > > >> | > Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 07:29:39 -0500 > | > > >> | > To: [email protected] > | > > >> | > Subject: (313) playlists and conversations > | > > >> | > > | > > >> | > For the person giving the years on his playlists, > | isnt that very > | > > >> | > fuggin geeked out? and all these techno > | conversation about what > | is > | > > >> | > techno, they all suck. Go to Submerge or > | something and ask mike > | > > >> | > banks. The basic fact is there is good music > | and bad, and > | > > >> | > acoustic music and electronic music. Thats it. > | Cant you guys go > | > > >> | > back to talking about new records and old > | records????? what is > | this > | > > >> | > shiznit? You guys bore everyone! And of course > | Missy Elliot is > | at > | > > >> | > least a little techno. That isnt just hand drums > | behind her > | > > >> | > vocals. And Adam beyer is also techno, its just > | pounding. Its > | > > >> | > obviously not Rhythim is Rhythim , but no > | disrespect. Id rather > | > > >> | > use this list to find out dj dates for Derrick May > | or any other > | > > >> | > non-half-azzed dj, so if anybody knows, where and > | when is Derrick > | > > >> | > playing, in the US or abroad??? And everybody quit > | the shiznit, > | > > >> | > save it for your toilets > | > > >> | > | > > >> | > | > > >> > | > > > > | > > |
