Too many sukkas, not enuff juice. k
>-----Original Message----- >From: Alex Bates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 1:47 PM >To: Rob Jarvis. Victoria Music Ltd.; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313 Mailing List >Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic) >((year2003)) > > >too many chin strokers > >not enuff panty peelers > >ab >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Rob Jarvis. Victoria Music Ltd." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "313 Mailing List" <[email protected]> >Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 12:18 AM >Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic) >((year2003)) > > >That's probably why there's not many Ladies in the "electronic" music >industry. Too many geeks not enough "stardom". > >Rob Jarvis > >Victoria Music Ltd. >Unit 215 old gramaphone works >326 Kensal Road >London >W10 5BZ >+ 44 (0)20 7565 8193 voice >+ 44 (0)20 8960 3834 fax > >http://www.victoria-music.com >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (MSN messenger) > >pro-jex + killa bite + inform + subvoice + room tone + housedust + >nepenta + >u7 + kne' deep + rodeo meat + response audio + sounds unique + hypercubic + >radio sonic + neon + feedback > >> From: robin pinning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 13:44:32 +0000 (GMT) >> To: "Rob Jarvis. Victoria Music Ltd." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic) ((year >2003)) >> >> >> >> we're all geeks.....this is an email discussion forum after all. >> >> >> embrace your geekdom, don't deny it. >> >> :) >> >> robin... >> >> >>> Hmmm... >>> I'm guessing that if a bad Techno record is mixed at a party while geeks >are >>> discussing it, that makes it Detroit. >>> >>> Rob Jarvis >>> >>> Victoria Music Ltd. >>> Unit 215 old gramaphone works >>> 326 Kensal Road >>> London >>> W10 5BZ >>> + 44 (0)20 7565 8193 voice >>> + 44 (0)20 8960 3834 fax >>> >>> http://www.victoria-music.com >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MSN messenger) >>> >>> pro-jex + killa bite + inform + subvoice + room tone + housedust + >nepenta + >>> u7 + kne' deep + rodeo meat + response audio + sounds unique + >hypercubic >+ >>> radio sonic + neon + feedback >>> >>>> From: Ralf Gill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 02:34:37 +1300 >>>> To: "'Rob Jarvis. Victoria Music Ltd.'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >>>> "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> >>>> Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic) >>>> >>>> im confused now...does the year or the music make the techno good or >bad, or >>>> does it all hinge on the geeks discussion... >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Rob Jarvis. Victoria Music Ltd. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2003 2:24 a.m. >>>> To: Ralf Gill; 313 Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic) >>>> >>>> >>>> LOL. >>>> that's more like it. discussing a geek's party is quite geeky >in itself. >>>> and as we all know there are good discussions and bad discussions. >(2003) >>>> >>>> Rob Jarvis >>>> >>>> Victoria Music Ltd. >>>> Unit 215 old gramaphone works >>>> 326 Kensal Road >>>> London >>>> W10 5BZ >>>> + 44 (0)20 7565 8193 voice >>>> + 44 (0)20 8960 3834 fax >>>> >>>> http://www.victoria-music.com >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MSN messenger) >>>> >>>> pro-jex + killa bite + inform + subvoice + room tone + housedust + >nepenta + >>>> u7 + kne' deep + rodeo meat + response audio + sounds unique + >hypercubic + >>>> radio sonic + neon + feedback >>>> >>>>> From: Ralf Gill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 01:49:18 +1300 >>>>> To: "'Brendan Nelson'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >"'[email protected]'" >>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>> Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic) >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, but sometimes it makes the bad party more relevant, like I went >to a >>>>> party in 1983, by the time I stopped it was 1994, and although the >party >>>> and >>>>> all the people looked totally out-dated, when we told the hospital the >>>> year >>>>> they said it was cool because they could see how i ended up like >this... >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Brendan Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2003 1:41 a.m. >>>>> To: Ralf Gill; ::); [email protected] >>>>> Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That's not relevant! As we all know, there are just good parties and >bad >>>>> parties. Discussing when they actually happen is fuggin geeked out... >:) >>>>> >>>>> | -----Original Message----- >>>>> | From: Ralf Gill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> | Sent: 18 February 2003 12:42 >>>>> | To: '::)'; '[email protected]' >>>>> | Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic) >>>>> | >>>>> | >>>>> | >>>>> | >>>>> | -----Original Message----- >>>>> | From: ::) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> | Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2003 1:40 a.m. >>>>> | To: 313 Mailing List >>>>> | Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic) >>>>> | >>>>> | >>>>> | >>>>> | This party, what year was it ? >>>>> | >>>>> | >>>>> | >ok so hi >>>>> | >>>>> | >we should end this and talk about something else. >>>>> | >>>>> | what about the new hawtin and vath album? I never heard >>>>> | anyone talk about >>>>> | it >>>>> | >>>>> | anyone wanna have a party? >>>>> | >>>>> | >>>>> | -Joe >>>>> | >>>>> | >>>>> | ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> | From: "Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> | To: "Odeluga, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "James Bucknell" >>>>> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "313 Mailing List" >>>>> | <[email protected]> >>>>> | Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:29 AM >>>>> | Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations >>>>> | >>>>> | >>>>> | > Well, maybe there is an interesting point here. Do tracks just >stand >>>>> | alone, >>>>> | > without any context in time? I personally like to know when >>>>> | a track was >>>>> | > done, it gives me an idea of how the artist was affected by >>>>> | the scene >>>>> | > surrounding them, and the influences that are at play. >>>>> | > >>>>> | > I have tracks that are wicked for the time, but now sound a a >little >>>>> | dated. >>>>> | > They still retain some of their original power, but now >>>>> | can be seen as >>>>> | > important advances for their respective times. Maybe the >>>>> | dispute arose >>>>> | over >>>>> | > listing years that are quite recent? Seeing tracklistings >>>>> | with (2001), >>>>> | > (2000), or (1998) in them might look overly anal, but still >>>>> | I like to >>>>> | trace >>>>> | > an artist's development, so for me it's important information. >>>>> | > >>>>> | > Just my tuppence, >>>>> | > >>>>> | > Andrew >>>>> | > >>>>> | > >>>>> | > ----- Original Message ----- >>>>> | > From: "Odeluga, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> | > To: "James Bucknell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; >>>>> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "313 >>>>> | > Mailing List" <[email protected]> >>>>> | > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 12:16 PM >>>>> | > Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations >>>>> | > >>>>> | > >>>>> | > > Now we are going to argue about putting years of tracks >>>>> | on tracklists, >>>>> | or >>>>> | > > not - I had thought I'd seen the further limits of >>>>> | triviality on this >>>>> | > list, >>>>> | > > till now!! >>>>> | > > >>>>> | > > ¦-D >>>>> | > > >>>>> | > > >-----Original Message----- >>>>> | > > >From: James Bucknell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> | > > >Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 4:12 AM >>>>> | > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313 Mailing List >>>>> | > > >Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations >>>>> | > > > >>>>> | > > > >>>>> | > > >the reason for putting the year of release in a track >>>>> | listing is the >>>>> | same >>>>> | > > >reason that track listings mention the artist, title, >>>>> | record label and >>>>> | > mix. >>>>> | > > >it's information that is useful for those that want to >>>>> | track it down. >>>>> | > > >james >>>>> | > > > >>>>> | > > > >>>>> | > > >> | >>>>> | > > >> | >>>>> | > > >> | > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> | > > >> | > Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 07:29:39 -0500 >>>>> | > > >> | > To: [email protected] >>>>> | > > >> | > Subject: (313) playlists and conversations >>>>> | > > >> | > >>>>> | > > >> | > For the person giving the years on his playlists, >>>>> | isnt that very >>>>> | > > >> | > fuggin geeked out? and all these techno >>>>> | conversation about what >>>>> | is >>>>> | > > >> | > techno, they all suck. Go to Submerge or >>>>> | something and ask mike >>>>> | > > >> | > banks. The basic fact is there is good music >>>>> | and bad, and >>>>> | > > >> | > acoustic music and electronic music. Thats it. >>>>> | Cant you guys go >>>>> | > > >> | > back to talking about new records and old >>>>> | records????? what is >>>>> | this >>>>> | > > >> | > shiznit? You guys bore everyone! And of course >>>>> | Missy Elliot is >>>>> | at >>>>> | > > >> | > least a little techno. That isnt just hand drums >>>>> | behind her >>>>> | > > >> | > vocals. And Adam beyer is also techno, its just >>>>> | pounding. Its >>>>> | > > >> | > obviously not Rhythim is Rhythim , but no >>>>> | disrespect. Id rather >>>>> | > > >> | > use this list to find out dj dates for Derrick May >>>>> | or any other >>>>> | > > >> | > non-half-azzed dj, so if anybody knows, where and >>>>> | when is Derrick >>>>> | > > >> | > playing, in the US or abroad??? And everybody quit >>>>> | the shiznit, >>>>> | > > >> | > save it for your toilets >>>>> | > > >> | >>>>> | > > >> | >>>>> | > > >> >>>>> | > > > >>>>> | > >>>>> | >>> >>> >> >> robin... >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Dr. Robin Pinning | E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Manchester Computing, University of Manchester, | T: +44 161 275 7028 >> Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom. | F: +44 161 275 6040 >> --------------------------www.mrccs.man.ac.uk------------------------- >> > > >
