Geeks are hot.

Love,
Dina


----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Jarvis. Victoria Music Ltd." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "313 Mailing List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:48 AM
Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic) ((year2003))


> That's probably why there's not many Ladies in the "electronic" music
> industry. Too many geeks not enough "stardom".
>
> Rob Jarvis
>
> Victoria Music Ltd.
> Unit 215 old gramaphone works
> 326 Kensal Road
> London
> W10 5BZ
> + 44 (0)20 7565 8193 voice
> + 44 (0)20 8960 3834 fax
>
> http://www.victoria-music.com
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MSN messenger)
>
> pro-jex + killa bite + inform + subvoice + room tone + housedust + nepenta
+
> u7 + kne' deep + rodeo meat + response audio + sounds unique + hypercubic
+
> radio sonic + neon + feedback
>
> > From: robin pinning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 13:44:32 +0000 (GMT)
> > To: "Rob Jarvis. Victoria Music Ltd." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic) ((year
2003))
> >
> >
> >
> > we're all geeks.....this is an email discussion forum after all.
> >
> >
> > embrace your geekdom, don't deny it.
> >
> > :)
> >
> > robin...
> >
> >
> >> Hmmm...
> >> I'm guessing that if a bad Techno record is mixed at a party while
geeks are
> >> discussing it, that makes it Detroit.
> >>
> >> Rob Jarvis
> >>
> >> Victoria Music Ltd.
> >> Unit 215 old gramaphone works
> >> 326 Kensal Road
> >> London
> >> W10 5BZ
> >> + 44 (0)20 7565 8193 voice
> >> + 44 (0)20 8960 3834 fax
> >>
> >> http://www.victoria-music.com
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MSN messenger)
> >>
> >> pro-jex + killa bite + inform + subvoice + room tone + housedust +
nepenta +
> >> u7 + kne' deep + rodeo meat + response audio + sounds unique +
hypercubic +
> >> radio sonic + neon + feedback
> >>
> >>> From: Ralf Gill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 02:34:37 +1300
> >>> To: "'Rob Jarvis. Victoria Music Ltd.'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> >>> "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]>
> >>> Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic)
> >>>
> >>> im confused now...does the year or the music make the techno good or
bad, or
> >>> does it all hinge on the geeks discussion...
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Rob Jarvis. Victoria Music Ltd. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2003 2:24 a.m.
> >>> To: Ralf Gill; 313 Mailing List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> LOL.
> >>> that's more like it. discussing a geek's party is quite geeky in
itself.
> >>> and as we all know there are good discussions and bad discussions.
(2003)
> >>>
> >>> Rob Jarvis
> >>>
> >>> Victoria Music Ltd.
> >>> Unit 215 old gramaphone works
> >>> 326 Kensal Road
> >>> London
> >>> W10 5BZ
> >>> + 44 (0)20 7565 8193 voice
> >>> + 44 (0)20 8960 3834 fax
> >>>
> >>> http://www.victoria-music.com
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (MSN messenger)
> >>>
> >>> pro-jex + killa bite + inform + subvoice + room tone + housedust +
nepenta +
> >>> u7 + kne' deep + rodeo meat + response audio + sounds unique +
hypercubic +
> >>> radio sonic + neon + feedback
> >>>
> >>>> From: Ralf Gill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 01:49:18 +1300
> >>>> To: "'Brendan Nelson'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"'[email protected]'"
> >>>> <[email protected]>
> >>>> Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic)
> >>>>
> >>>> Yeah, but sometimes it makes the bad party more relevant, like I went
to a
> >>>> party in 1983, by the time I stopped it was 1994, and although the
party
> >>> and
> >>>> all the people looked totally out-dated, when we told the hospital
the
> >>> year
> >>>> they said it was cool because they could see how i ended up like
this...
> >>>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Brendan Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2003 1:41 a.m.
> >>>> To: Ralf Gill; ::); [email protected]
> >>>> Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> That's not relevant! As we all know, there are just good parties and
bad
> >>>> parties. Discussing when they actually happen is fuggin geeked out...
:)
> >>>>
> >>>> | -----Original Message-----
> >>>> | From: Ralf Gill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> | Sent: 18 February 2003 12:42
> >>>> | To: '::)'; '[email protected]'
> >>>> | Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic)
> >>>> |
> >>>> |
> >>>> |
> >>>> |
> >>>> | -----Original Message-----
> >>>> | From: ::) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> | Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2003 1:40 a.m.
> >>>> | To: 313 Mailing List
> >>>> | Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations (changing topic)
> >>>> |
> >>>> |
> >>>> |
> >>>> | This party, what year was it ?
> >>>> |
> >>>> |
> >>>> | >ok so hi
> >>>> |
> >>>> | >we should end this and talk about something else.
> >>>> |
> >>>> | what about the new hawtin and vath album?  I never heard
> >>>> | anyone talk about
> >>>> | it
> >>>> |
> >>>> | anyone wanna have a party?
> >>>> |
> >>>> |
> >>>> | -Joe
> >>>> |
> >>>> |
> >>>> | ----- Original Message -----
> >>>> | From: "Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>> | To: "Odeluga, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "James Bucknell"
> >>>> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "313 Mailing List"
> >>>> | <[email protected]>
> >>>> | Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 7:29 AM
> >>>> | Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations
> >>>> |
> >>>> |
> >>>> | > Well, maybe there is an interesting point here. Do tracks just
stand
> >>>> | alone,
> >>>> | > without any context in time? I personally like to know when
> >>>> | a track was
> >>>> | > done, it gives me an idea of how the artist was affected by
> >>>> | the scene
> >>>> | > surrounding them, and the influences that are at play.
> >>>> | >
> >>>> | > I have tracks that are wicked for the time, but now sound a a
little
> >>>> | dated.
> >>>> | > They still retain some of their original power,  but now
> >>>> | can be seen as
> >>>> | > important advances for their respective times. Maybe the
> >>>> | dispute arose
> >>>> | over
> >>>> | > listing years that are quite recent? Seeing tracklistings
> >>>> | with (2001),
> >>>> | > (2000), or (1998) in them might look overly anal, but still
> >>>> | I like to
> >>>> | trace
> >>>> | > an artist's development, so for me it's important information.
> >>>> | >
> >>>> | > Just my tuppence,
> >>>> | >
> >>>> | > Andrew
> >>>> | >
> >>>> | >
> >>>> | > ----- Original Message -----
> >>>> | > From: "Odeluga, Ken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>> | > To: "James Bucknell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> >>>> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "313
> >>>> | > Mailing List" <[email protected]>
> >>>> | > Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 12:16 PM
> >>>> | > Subject: RE: (313) playlists and conversations
> >>>> | >
> >>>> | >
> >>>> | > > Now we are going to argue about putting years of tracks
> >>>> | on tracklists,
> >>>> | or
> >>>> | > > not - I had thought I'd seen the further limits of
> >>>> | triviality on this
> >>>> | > list,
> >>>> | > > till now!!
> >>>> | > >
> >>>> | > > ¦-D
> >>>> | > >
> >>>> | > > >-----Original Message-----
> >>>> | > > >From: James Bucknell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> | > > >Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 4:12 AM
> >>>> | > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313 Mailing List
> >>>> | > > >Subject: Re: (313) playlists and conversations
> >>>> | > > >
> >>>> | > > >
> >>>> | > > >the reason for putting the year of release in a track
> >>>> | listing is the
> >>>> | same
> >>>> | > > >reason that track listings mention the artist, title,
> >>>> | record label and
> >>>> | > mix.
> >>>> | > > >it's information that is useful for those that want to
> >>>> | track it down.
> >>>> | > > >james
> >>>> | > > >
> >>>> | > > >
> >>>> | > > >> |
> >>>> | > > >> |
> >>>> | > > >> | > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>> | > > >> | > Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 07:29:39 -0500
> >>>> | > > >> | > To: [email protected]
> >>>> | > > >> | > Subject: (313) playlists and conversations
> >>>> | > > >> | >
> >>>> | > > >> | > For the person giving the years on his playlists,
> >>>> | isnt that very
> >>>> | > > >> | > fuggin geeked out? and all these techno
> >>>> | conversation about what
> >>>> | is
> >>>> | > > >> | > techno, they all suck.  Go to Submerge or
> >>>> | something and ask mike
> >>>> | > > >> | > banks.    The basic fact is there is good music
> >>>> | and bad, and
> >>>> | > > >> | > acoustic music and electronic music.  Thats it.
> >>>> | Cant you guys go
> >>>> | > > >> | > back to talking about new records and old
> >>>> | records????? what is
> >>>> | this
> >>>> | > > >> | > shiznit? You guys bore everyone!  And of course
> >>>> | Missy Elliot is
> >>>> | at
> >>>> | > > >> | > least a little techno.  That isnt just hand drums
> >>>> | behind her
> >>>> | > > >> | > vocals.  And Adam beyer is also techno, its just
> >>>> | pounding.  Its
> >>>> | > > >> | > obviously not Rhythim is Rhythim , but no
> >>>> | disrespect.  Id rather
> >>>> | > > >> | > use this list to find out dj dates for Derrick May
> >>>> | or any other
> >>>> | > > >> | > non-half-azzed dj, so if anybody knows, where and
> >>>> | when is Derrick
> >>>> | > > >> | > playing, in the US or abroad??? And everybody quit
> >>>> | the shiznit,
> >>>> | > > >> | > save it for your toilets
> >>>> | > > >> |
> >>>> | > > >> |
> >>>> | > > >>
> >>>> | > > >
> >>>> | >
> >>>> |
> >>
> >>
> >
> > robin...
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Dr. Robin Pinning                               | E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Manchester Computing, University of Manchester, | T:  +44 161 275 7028
> > Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom.            | F:  +44 161 275 6040
> > --------------------------www.mrccs.man.ac.uk-------------------------
> >

Reply via email to