come on tim. this list isn't about defending artists, its about criticizing artists- "who we want, when we want, if we feel it is necessary"
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Steward, Tim wrote: > Now you knew I would have to respond to that statement. > It's your opinion to like or dislike any artist. But as > a true music lover you must respect all artist. And I am > definitely a big Jeff Mills fan. > > TS-1 > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 1:26 PM > To: Robert Taylor > Cc: Paul Kendrick; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] > Subject: RE: (313) Kevin Saunderson & Carl Craig last weekend in London > > > i hate jeff mills > > On Thu, 6 May 2004, Robert Taylor wrote: > > > We should be able to criticize who we want, when we want, if we feel it is >- necessary > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Paul Kendrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 2:48 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected] > > Subject: RE: (313) Kevin Saunderson & Carl Craig last weekend in London > > > > > > On or may be off topic, can we give this Garnier beating a rest for a > while. or at least a week..... > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 06 May 2004 15:45 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: (313) Kevin Saunderson & Carl Craig last weekend in London > > > > > > > > >What's the WORST track you've ever heard a Detroit Legend/ Your > > >Favourite DJ play??? > > > > Well, he's neither my favourite dj, or detroit legend, but to be on topic, > > how's about Laurent Garnier playing that Prodigy track - what's all that > > about? It was never a good record, nor is it topical in anyway. > > > > I hate the prodigy. > > In fact I hate everything, it's all rubbish. > > > > Alex > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > --------------------- End of message text -------------------- > > > > This e-mail is sent by the above named in their > > individual, non-business capacity and is not on > > behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers. > > > > PricewaterhouseCoopers may monitor outgoing and incoming > > e-mails and other telecommunications on its e-mail and > > telecommunications systems. By replying to this e-mail you > > give your consent to such monitoring > > > > > > > > > > > ############################################################################ > ######### > > Note: > > > > Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not > necessarily represent > > those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. > This email > > and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use > of the > > individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received > this email in > > error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Thank You. > > > ############################################################################ > ######### > > > > > > > > The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It > contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named > addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose > it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately > and then destroy it. > >
