well if what matt said is what you believe, you certainly did not take the articulate route when trying to communicate that to the list :) that could be the source of confusion and "gun shots"
I dont even know why this list continually wastes its collective time on arguing whats good and whats not. every few emails you send arguing about what sounds good, you miss out on time that could be otherwise spent listening to or pursuing great music. imo of course. also, to whoever said woody mcbride is doing so-so productions, I have a white I received from him a month or two ago that might change your mind :) more info to follow I'm sure -Joe ----- Original Message ----- From: "Neil Wiernik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2004 12:35 PM Subject: Re: (313) 303 and an opinion > > > matt this is exactly what I started out tring to say but got all washed up > in doging the gun shots by the hardcore lovers... > my point is if its good its good and if its bad why bother... > sure lots of good in all music... just not all of it is good or long > standing... this is my point... > > > On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Matt MacQueen wrote: > > > I think when too much attention is paid to the big name trends in > > commercial dance music, your perception changes of what the underground > > is doing, it looks like a reaction to it when sometimes it isn't. I > > try my best to avoid even reading/knowing that crap, because in 6 mos. > > it will all be gone or moved on anyway, but enduring music, yes even > > dance music, (when done well) is built to last. You'll want to hear > > it again in 2, 3, 5, 10 years later. Or you'll hear elements of it in > > other, newer underground music.
