Thank you for your input, Alberto.

On 05/17/2016 07:38 AM, Alberto Viana wrote:
Rich,

I'm aware of that, what I'm trying to say is: Is the expected behavior to sync do not complete or stop because of one or more OUs does not exists in one of the sides (389 or AD)? Is not suppose to just generate some error and must go on?
I think so, too.

I have one question. In your first email, you wrote this, in which the problem is in 2012R2, but not in 2008R2. > I'm trying to setup a new scenario with 389 and AD 2012 R2 (So far I'm using with AD 2008 R2 and everything works fine).

Did you have a chance to run "full sync" against 2008R2, as well? Or just against 2012R2 and it failed?

There should not be a difference there, IMO...

Thanks,
--noriko
Thanx

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Rich Megginson <rmegg...@redhat.com <mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com>> wrote:

    On 05/17/2016 08:01 AM, Alberto Viana wrote:
    Noriko,

    Just to let you know, after I replicated/created the exactly same
    OU structure on both side, the replication seems to works fine.
    I'm still not sure that is the expected behavior:

    Yes, it is.  Winsync does _not_ sync the OU structure - you have
    to set that up manually so that the OU structure in AD matches the
    OU structure in 389.



    [17/May/2016:10:56:53 -0300] - windows_conn_connect : detected
    Win2k3 or later peer
    [17/May/2016:10:56:53 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows sync
    - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636): No linger to
    cancel on the connection
    [17/May/2016:10:56:54 -0300] - _csngen_adjust_local_time: gen
    state before 573b22010001:1463493115:0:6
    [17/May/2016:10:56:54 -0300] - _csngen_adjust_local_time: gen
    state after 573b232c0000:1463493414:0:6
    [17/May/2016:10:56:54 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows sync
    - windows_acquire_replica returned success (101)
    [17/May/2016:10:56:54 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows sync
    - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636): State:
    ready_to_acquire_replica -> sending_updates
    [17/May/2016:10:56:54 -0300] - csngen_adjust_time: gen state
    before 573b232c0001:1463493414:0:6
    [17/May/2016:10:56:54 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - changelog
    program - _cl5GetDBFile: found DB object 1b9d570 for database
    
/opt/dirsrv/var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-RNP/changelogdb/169ce382-1b9011e6-91ddc5b4-dc63c95a_55c88d99000000c80000.db


    On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Alberto Viana
    <alberto...@gmail.com <mailto:alberto...@gmail.com>> wrote:

        Noriko,
        /
        /
        /Did you use the same version of 389-ds-base against AD on
        2008 R2 and 2012 R2?/
        /389-Directory/1.3.4.8 <http://1.3.4.8> B2016.063.1654/
        /Please share the output frpm this command line "rpm -q
        389-ds-base"?/

        *I compiled 389 manually once the package in apt repo is too
        old for me (I'm using ubuntu 14.04 LTS). What specific info
        do you need?*
        *ds-base is 1.3.4.8*

        /Does this error message follow some other detailed error
        messages?  Such as .../
        /YOUR_AGREEMENT_NAMEFailed to send %s operation: LDAP error
        (ERROR_CODE) ERROR_MESSAGE/
        /or /
        /YOUR_AGREEMENT: Received error [%s] when attempting to %s
        entry [%s]: Please correct the attribute specified in the
        error message. Refer to the Windows Active Directory docs for
        more information./
        /If not, could you enable the replication log level and share
        the error log with us?/

        *After enable replication log level:*
        *[17/May/2016:09:13:18 -0300] - Attempting to add entry
        cn=Benedito
        Maia,ou=pop-go,ou=POPS,ou=EXTERNOS,ou=RNP,dc=homolog,dc=rnp
        to AD for local entry
        
uid=benedito.maia,ou=pop-go,ou=POPS,ou=EXTERNOS,ou=RNP,dc=homolog,dc=rnp*
        *[17/May/2016:09:13:18 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows
        sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636): Received
        result code 32 (0000208D: NameErr: DSID-03100238, problem
        2001 (NO_OBJECT), data 0, best match of:
        'OU=POPS,OU=EXTERNOS,OU=RNP,DC=homolog,DC=rnp' ) for add
        operation *
        *[17/May/2016:09:13:18 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows
        sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636):
        windows_process_total_add: Cannot replay add operation.*
        *[17/May/2016:09:13:18 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows
        sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636):
        Beginning linger on the connection*
        *[17/May/2016:09:13:18 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows
        sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636):
        windows_tot_run: failed to obtain data to send to the
        consumer; LDAP error - 1*
        *
        *
        *Once I do not have the same OU structure on both side (for
        testing purposes), I created
        "**ou=pop-go,ou=POPS,ou=EXTERNOS,ou=RNP,dc=homolog,dc=rnp" on
        AD side and started to get error in another OU that I have on
        389 side but not in AD.*
        *
        *
        *Is that the expected behavior?*
        *
        *
        *PS: In my production environment we use this strategy that
        what we dont want to be replicated, just not create the OU
        structure and works fine. I never found a better way to do
        that like a "exclude list".*


        /Could you also share your Windows Sync agreement?  Do you
        happen to have 2 Directory Servers -- one for 2008R2 and
        another for 2012R2, could you provide both?/


        *Here's my sync agreement:*
        *
        *
        *dn: cn=AD -
        DF-GTI-DC01,cn=replica,cn=dc\3Dhomolog\2Cdc\3Drnp,cn=mapping
        tree,*
        * cn=config*
        *objectClass: top*
        *objectClass: nsDSWindowsReplicationAgreement*
        *description: Sync with HOMOLOG DF-GTI-DC01*
        *cn: AD - DF-GTI-DC01*
        *nsds7WindowsReplicaSubtree: dc=homolog,dc=rnp*
        *nsds7DirectoryReplicaSubtree: dc=homolog,dc=rnp*
        *nsds7NewWinUserSyncEnabled: on*
        *nsds7NewWinGroupSyncEnabled: on*
        *nsds7WindowsDomain: homolog.rnp*
        *nsDS5ReplicaRoot: dc=homolog,dc=rnp*
        *nsDS5ReplicaHost: gti-df-dc01.homolog.rnp*
        *nsDS5ReplicaPort: 636*
        *nsDS5ReplicaBindDN: CN=Conta de sincronizacao do AD com LDAP
        389,OU=APLICACOES*
        * ,DC=homolog,DC=rnp*
        *nsDS5ReplicaTransportInfo: SSL*
        *nsDS5ReplicaBindMethod: SIMPLE*
        *nsDS5ReplicaCredentials:
        {AES-TUhNR0NTcUdTSWIzRFFFRkRUQm1NRVVHQ1NxR1NJYjNEUUVG*
        * 
RERBNEJDUXhNVEZoWmpjMVlTMDVaakkyTXpBNA0KTnkwNVl6RmxOV1UwWXkxaVpHWTBaVEkwWkFBQ*
        * 
0FRSUNBU0F3Q2dZSUtvWklodmNOQWdjd0hRWUpZSVpJQVdVRA0KQkFFcUJCQ0FNQytucnM5R09Pbm*
        * IrTGc5Q1BURw==}y3eiY+wIKrDUOvz08JXugA==*
        *nsds7DirsyncCookie::
        TVNEUwMAAABTrjoAO7DRAQAAAAAAAAAAWAAAAMJLBQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA*
        * 
ADCSwUAAAAAAOaoLC8LQH5DrKGkZbG6hSgBAAAAAAAAAAMAAAAAAAAAUFu8Kzif9UKPjH3e1siBWw*
        * 
A5AQAAAAAA5qgsLwtAfkOsoaRlsbqFKMNLBQAAAAAAdqnRrgBktU6JZXBssjxeIesdBQAAAAAA*
        *nsds5replicareapactive: 0*
        *nsds5replicaLastUpdateStart: 20160517125737Z*
        *nsds5replicaLastUpdateEnd: 20160517125737Z*
        *nsds5replicaChangesSentSinceStartup:*
        *nsds5replicaLastUpdateStatus: 0 Replica acquired
        successfully: Incremental upd*
        * ate started*
        *nsds5replicaUpdateInProgress: FALSE*
        *nsds5replicaLastInitStart: 20160517124301Z*
        *nsds5replicaLastInitEnd: 20160517125236Z*
        *nsds5replicaLastInitStatus: 1 connection error: operation
        failure - Total upda*
        * te aborted*
        *
        *
        *
        *
        *In this testing environment, I just have 2012 r2 (I upgraded
        all DCs to 2012). Right now, I don't have any 2008 r2 to test. *
        *
        *
        *In my production environment I have:*
        *389-ds-base 1.3.2.19 + Windows 2008 r2*

        On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Noriko Hosoi
        <nho...@redhat.com <mailto:nho...@redhat.com>> wrote:

            On 05/16/2016 01:01 PM, Alberto Viana wrote:
            I'm trying to setup a new scenario with 389 and AD 2012
            R2 (So far I'm using with AD 2008 R2 and everything
            works fine).
            Did you use the same version of 389-ds-base against AD on
            2008 R2 and 2012 R2?
            389-Directory/1.3.4.8 <http://1.3.4.8> B2016.063.1654
            Please share the output frpm this command line "rpm -q
            389-ds-base"?

            Windows 2012 R2 64bits
            Both 2008 R2 and 2012 R2 are supported.
            :
            After configure the AD replication and Initiate a full
            sync, it starts to do some entries and I got the
            following error:


            [16/May/2016:16:36:47 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin -
            windows sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01"
            (gti-df-dc01:636): windows_process_total_add: Cannot
            replay add operation.
            Does this error message follow some other detailed error
            messages?  Such as ...

                YOUR_AGREEMENT_NAMEFailed to send %s operation: LDAP
                error (ERROR_CODE) ERROR_MESSAGE

            or

                YOUR_AGREEMENT: Received error [%s] when attempting
                to %s entry [%s]: Please correct the attribute
                specified in the error message.  Refer to the Windows
                Active Directory docs for more information.

            If not, could you enable the replication log level and
            share the error log with us?

            And after that:

            [16/May/2016:16:36:47 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin -
            windows sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01"
            (gti-df-dc01:636): Replica has no update vector. It has
            never been initialized.
            [16/May/2016:16:36:47 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin -
            windows sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01"
            (gti-df-dc01:636): Replica has no update vector. It has
            never been initialized.
            [16/May/2016:16:36:51 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin -
            windows sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01"
            (gti-df-dc01:636): Replica has no update vector. It has
            never been initialized.


            I found a really old ticket that seems to be related to
            same error:

            https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47589
This is a regression only affected 389-ds-base-1.3.1.x. So, 1.3.4.x does not need the patch.

            but with win2008r2 and fixed.

            According to this link ->
            
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/10/html/Administration_Guide/supported-ad.html

            2012 R2 is supported, is that true?
            Could you also share your Windows Sync agreement?  Do you
            happen to have 2 Directory Servers -- one for 2008R2 and
            another for 2012R2, could you provide both?

            Any clues?




            --
            389-users mailing list
            389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
            <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
            
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org


            --
            389-users mailing list
            389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
            <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
            
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org





    --
    389-users mailing list
    389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
    <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
    http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org



    --
    389-users mailing list
    389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
    <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
    http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org




--
389-users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org

--
389-users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to