Thanks a lot, Alberto!

I've opened a ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48841

On 05/17/2016 12:27 PM, Alberto Viana wrote:
Noriko,

/I have one question. In your first email, you wrote this, in which the problem is in 2012R2, but not in 2008R2./

*Sorry, I don't have any 2008 r2 in my lab... I just tested with 2012 r2 and it failed. *
*
*
*Here's my scenarios*
*
*
*My lab environment:*
*389-ds-base 1.3.4.8 + win 2012 r2*
*
*
*OU just in 389 side with users: Full sync failed, log error:*
*
*
*
[17/May/2016:14:19:44 -0300] - Attempting to add entry cn=mais um teste,ou=teste,ou=RNP,dc=homolog,dc=rnp to AD for local entry uid=teste.teste,ou=teste,ou=RNP,dc=homolog,dc=rnp [17/May/2016:14:19:44 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636): Received result code 32 (0000208D: NameErr: DSID-03100238, problem 2001 (NO_OBJECT), data 0, best match of: 'OU=RNP,DC=homolog,DC=rnp' ) for add operation [17/May/2016:14:19:44 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636): windows_process_total_add: Cannot replay add operation. [17/May/2016:14:19:44 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636): Beginning linger on the connection [17/May/2016:14:19:44 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636): windows_tot_run: failed to obtain data to send to the consumer; LDAP error - 1
[17/May/2016:14:19:44 -0300] - Calling dirsync search request plugin
[17/May/2016:14:19:44 -0300] - Sending dirsync search request
[17/May/2016:14:19:45 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636): Cancelling linger on the connection [17/May/2016:14:19:45 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636): Disconnected from the consumer [17/May/2016:14:19:45 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows sync - windows_inc_runs: cancelled dirsync: 7fa660001d60, rval: 1

*
*
*
*OU just in AD side with users: Full sync ok*
*
*

*My production environment:*
*389-ds-base 1.3.2.19 + win 2008 r2 *
*
*
*OU just in 389 side with users: Full sync ok*
*OU just in AD side with users: Full sync ok*
*
*
*
*
*If you need any other info, please let me know.*
*
*
*
*

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Noriko Hosoi <nho...@redhat.com <mailto:nho...@redhat.com>> wrote:

    Thank you for your input, Alberto.

    On 05/17/2016 07:38 AM, Alberto Viana wrote:
    Rich,

    I'm aware of that, what I'm trying to say is: Is the expected
    behavior to sync do not complete or stop because of one or more
    OUs does not exists in one of the sides (389 or AD)? Is not
    suppose to just generate some error and must go on?
    I think so, too.

    I have one question.  In your first email, you wrote this, in
    which the problem is in 2012R2, but not in 2008R2.
    > I'm trying to setup a new scenario with 389 and AD 2012 R2 (So
    far I'm using with AD 2008 R2 and everything works fine).

Did you have a chance to run "full sync" against 2008R2, as well? Or just against 2012R2 and it failed?

    There should not be a difference there, IMO...

    Thanks,
    --noriko

    Thanx

    On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Rich Megginson
    <rmegg...@redhat.com <mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com>> wrote:

        On 05/17/2016 08:01 AM, Alberto Viana wrote:
        Noriko,

        Just to let you know, after I replicated/created the exactly
        same OU structure on both side, the replication seems to
        works fine. I'm still not sure that is the expected behavior:

        Yes, it is.  Winsync does _not_ sync the OU structure - you
        have to set that up manually so that the OU structure in AD
        matches the OU structure in 389.



        [17/May/2016:10:56:53 -0300] - windows_conn_connect :
        detected Win2k3 or later peer
        [17/May/2016:10:56:53 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows
        sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636): No
        linger to cancel on the connection
        [17/May/2016:10:56:54 -0300] - _csngen_adjust_local_time:
        gen state before 573b22010001:1463493115:0:6
        [17/May/2016:10:56:54 -0300] - _csngen_adjust_local_time:
        gen state after 573b232c0000:1463493414:0:6
        [17/May/2016:10:56:54 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows
        sync - windows_acquire_replica returned success (101)
        [17/May/2016:10:56:54 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin - windows
        sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01" (gti-df-dc01:636): State:
        ready_to_acquire_replica -> sending_updates
        [17/May/2016:10:56:54 -0300] - csngen_adjust_time: gen state
        before 573b232c0001:1463493414:0:6
        [17/May/2016:10:56:54 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin -
        changelog program - _cl5GetDBFile: found DB object 1b9d570
        for database
        
/opt/dirsrv/var/lib/dirsrv/slapd-RNP/changelogdb/169ce382-1b9011e6-91ddc5b4-dc63c95a_55c88d99000000c80000.db


        On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Alberto Viana
        <alberto...@gmail.com <mailto:alberto...@gmail.com>> wrote:

            Noriko,
            /
            /
            /Did you use the same version of 389-ds-base against AD
            on 2008 R2 and 2012 R2?/
            /389-Directory/1.3.4.8 <http://1.3.4.8> B2016.063.1654/
            /Please share the output frpm this command line "rpm -q
            389-ds-base"?/

            *I compiled 389 manually once the package in apt repo is
            too old for me (I'm using ubuntu 14.04 LTS). What
            specific info do you need?*
            *ds-base is 1.3.4.8*

            /Does this error message follow some other detailed
            error messages?  Such as .../
            /YOUR_AGREEMENT_NAMEFailed to send %s operation: LDAP
            error (ERROR_CODE) ERROR_MESSAGE/
            /or /
            /YOUR_AGREEMENT: Received error [%s] when attempting to
            %s entry [%s]: Please correct the attribute specified in
            the error message.  Refer to the Windows Active
            Directory docs for more information./
            /If not, could you enable the replication log level and
            share the error log with us?/

            *After enable replication log level:*
            *[17/May/2016:09:13:18 -0300] - Attempting to add entry
            cn=Benedito
            Maia,ou=pop-go,ou=POPS,ou=EXTERNOS,ou=RNP,dc=homolog,dc=rnp
            to AD for local entry
            
uid=benedito.maia,ou=pop-go,ou=POPS,ou=EXTERNOS,ou=RNP,dc=homolog,dc=rnp*
            *[17/May/2016:09:13:18 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin -
            windows sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01"
            (gti-df-dc01:636): Received result code 32 (0000208D:
            NameErr: DSID-03100238, problem 2001 (NO_OBJECT), data
            0, best match of:
            'OU=POPS,OU=EXTERNOS,OU=RNP,DC=homolog,DC=rnp' ) for add
            operation *
            *[17/May/2016:09:13:18 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin -
            windows sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01"
            (gti-df-dc01:636): windows_process_total_add: Cannot
            replay add operation.*
            *[17/May/2016:09:13:18 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin -
            windows sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01"
            (gti-df-dc01:636): Beginning linger on the connection*
            *[17/May/2016:09:13:18 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin -
            windows sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01"
            (gti-df-dc01:636): windows_tot_run: failed to obtain
            data to send to the consumer; LDAP error - 1*
            *
            *
            *Once I do not have the same OU structure on both side
            (for testing purposes), I created
            "**ou=pop-go,ou=POPS,ou=EXTERNOS,ou=RNP,dc=homolog,dc=rnp"
            on AD side and started to get error in another OU that I
            have on 389 side but not in AD.*
            *
            *
            *Is that the expected behavior?*
            *
            *
            *PS: In my production environment we use this strategy
            that what we dont want to be replicated, just not create
            the OU structure and works fine. I never found a better
            way to do that like a "exclude list".*


            /Could you also share your Windows Sync agreement?  Do
            you happen to have 2 Directory Servers -- one for 2008R2
            and another for 2012R2, could you provide both?/


            *Here's my sync agreement:*
            *
            *
            *dn: cn=AD -
            DF-GTI-DC01,cn=replica,cn=dc\3Dhomolog\2Cdc\3Drnp,cn=mapping
            tree,*
            * cn=config*
            *objectClass: top*
            *objectClass: nsDSWindowsReplicationAgreement*
            *description: Sync with HOMOLOG DF-GTI-DC01*
            *cn: AD - DF-GTI-DC01*
            *nsds7WindowsReplicaSubtree: dc=homolog,dc=rnp*
            *nsds7DirectoryReplicaSubtree: dc=homolog,dc=rnp*
            *nsds7NewWinUserSyncEnabled: on*
            *nsds7NewWinGroupSyncEnabled: on*
            *nsds7WindowsDomain: homolog.rnp*
            *nsDS5ReplicaRoot: dc=homolog,dc=rnp*
            *nsDS5ReplicaHost: gti-df-dc01.homolog.rnp*
            *nsDS5ReplicaPort: 636*
            *nsDS5ReplicaBindDN: CN=Conta de sincronizacao do AD com
            LDAP 389,OU=APLICACOES*
            * ,DC=homolog,DC=rnp*
            *nsDS5ReplicaTransportInfo: SSL*
            *nsDS5ReplicaBindMethod: SIMPLE*
            *nsDS5ReplicaCredentials:
            {AES-TUhNR0NTcUdTSWIzRFFFRkRUQm1NRVVHQ1NxR1NJYjNEUUVG*
            * 
RERBNEJDUXhNVEZoWmpjMVlTMDVaakkyTXpBNA0KTnkwNVl6RmxOV1UwWXkxaVpHWTBaVEkwWkFBQ*
            * 
0FRSUNBU0F3Q2dZSUtvWklodmNOQWdjd0hRWUpZSVpJQVdVRA0KQkFFcUJCQ0FNQytucnM5R09Pbm*
            * IrTGc5Q1BURw==}y3eiY+wIKrDUOvz08JXugA==*
            *nsds7DirsyncCookie::
            TVNEUwMAAABTrjoAO7DRAQAAAAAAAAAAWAAAAMJLBQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA*
            * 
ADCSwUAAAAAAOaoLC8LQH5DrKGkZbG6hSgBAAAAAAAAAAMAAAAAAAAAUFu8Kzif9UKPjH3e1siBWw*
            * 
A5AQAAAAAA5qgsLwtAfkOsoaRlsbqFKMNLBQAAAAAAdqnRrgBktU6JZXBssjxeIesdBQAAAAAA*
            *nsds5replicareapactive: 0*
            *nsds5replicaLastUpdateStart: 20160517125737Z*
            *nsds5replicaLastUpdateEnd: 20160517125737Z*
            *nsds5replicaChangesSentSinceStartup:*
            *nsds5replicaLastUpdateStatus: 0 Replica acquired
            successfully: Incremental upd*
            * ate started*
            *nsds5replicaUpdateInProgress: FALSE*
            *nsds5replicaLastInitStart: 20160517124301Z*
            *nsds5replicaLastInitEnd: 20160517125236Z*
            *nsds5replicaLastInitStatus: 1 connection error:
            operation failure - Total upda*
            * te aborted*
            *
            *
            *
            *
            *In this testing environment, I just have 2012 r2 (I
            upgraded all DCs to 2012). Right now, I don't have any
            2008 r2 to test. *
            *
            *
            *In my production environment I have:*
            *389-ds-base 1.3.2.19 + Windows 2008 r2*

            On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 6:02 PM, Noriko Hosoi
            <nho...@redhat.com <mailto:nho...@redhat.com>> wrote:

                On 05/16/2016 01:01 PM, Alberto Viana wrote:
                I'm trying to setup a new scenario with 389 and AD
                2012 R2 (So far I'm using with AD 2008 R2 and
                everything works fine).
                Did you use the same version of 389-ds-base against
                AD on 2008 R2 and 2012 R2?
                389-Directory/1.3.4.8 <http://1.3.4.8> B2016.063.1654
                Please share the output frpm this command line "rpm
                -q 389-ds-base"?

                Windows 2012 R2 64bits
                Both 2008 R2 and 2012 R2 are supported.
                :
                After configure the AD replication and Initiate a
                full sync, it starts to do some entries and I got
                the following error:


                [16/May/2016:16:36:47 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin
                - windows sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01"
                (gti-df-dc01:636): windows_process_total_add:
                Cannot replay add operation.
                Does this error message follow some other detailed
                error messages?  Such as ...

                    YOUR_AGREEMENT_NAMEFailed to send %s operation:
                    LDAP error (ERROR_CODE) ERROR_MESSAGE

                or

                    YOUR_AGREEMENT: Received error [%s] when
                    attempting to %s entry [%s]: Please correct the
                    attribute specified in the error message. Refer
                    to the Windows Active Directory docs for more
                    information.

                If not, could you enable the replication log level
                and share the error log with us?

                And after that:

                [16/May/2016:16:36:47 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin
                - windows sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01"
                (gti-df-dc01:636): Replica has no update vector. It
                has never been initialized.
                [16/May/2016:16:36:47 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin
                - windows sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01"
                (gti-df-dc01:636): Replica has no update vector. It
                has never been initialized.
                [16/May/2016:16:36:51 -0300] NSMMReplicationPlugin
                - windows sync - agmt="cn=AD - DF-GTI-DC01"
                (gti-df-dc01:636): Replica has no update vector. It
                has never been initialized.


                I found a really old ticket that seems to be
                related to same error:

                https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47589
                This is a regression only affected
                389-ds-base-1.3.1.x. So, 1.3.4.x does not need the
                patch.

                but with win2008r2 and fixed.

                According to this link ->
                
https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/10/html/Administration_Guide/supported-ad.html

                2012 R2 is supported, is that true?
Could you also share your Windows Sync agreement? Do you happen to have 2 Directory Servers -- one for
                2008R2 and another for 2012R2, could you provide both?

                Any clues?




                --
                389-users mailing list
                389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
                <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
                
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org


                --
                389-users mailing list
                389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
                <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
                
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org





        --
        389-users mailing list
        389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
        <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
        
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org



        --
        389-users mailing list
        389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
        <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
        
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org




    --
    389-users mailing list
    389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
    <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
    http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org


    --
    389-users mailing list
    389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
    <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
    http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org




--
389-users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org

--
389-users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to