Depends on your application. Is it all data entry and record manipulation? If so, hardly any benefit will be seen from compiling.
If it's code intensive, array intensive, object intensive, etc. then you'll see a big improvement. I'd say the differences between interpreted and compiled code remain the same but the baseline of interpreted performance has shifted WAY up... so it may not even matter to your users. Jeff > On Oct 18, 2016, at 12:51 PM, David Rose <drose...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I have been working on a half dozen small 4D databases in the past several > years, and have gotten away with running them interpreted in production with > no complaints from users. I am wondering, though, how much of an improvement > in performance will we see if we compile. Have improvements in CPUs resulted > in a smaller or larger difference between interpreted and compiled databases? > Are there any recent comparative performance tests available? ********************************************************************** 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) FAQ: http://lists.4d.com/faqnug.html Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html Options: http://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech Unsub: mailto:4d_tech-unsubscr...@lists.4d.com **********************************************************************
