that all is great until the hardware running the 4,382,619 VMs crashes :/
Chip On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 16:23:18 +0100, Peter Jakobsson via 4D_Tech wrote: > > He also was of the categorical opinion that the only way to really > keep applications “isolated” from each other (i.e. not bring > everything else down when they crashed) was to give each mission > critical application or service its own VM. We have done so much, with so little, for so long; We are now qualified to anything with nothing <sigh> - unknown ********************************************************************** 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech Unsub: mailto:[email protected] **********************************************************************
