Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Grammostola Rosea wrote:
>   
>> - (no easy way to enable VST? dssi-vst, wine, wineasio?)
>>   
>>     
>
> VST isn't FLOSS. Thinking of VSTi, you will get trouble with the timing,
> I guess for VST FX this isn't a serious problem. Wineasio has got
> serious performance issues, I once run Reaper for different 64bit distros.
>   
FST is FLOSS. Dssi-vst is 'almost' FLOSS (?). Wineasio is needed for 
reaper I think (maybe a recent howto to make this work on 64studio is 
better then including it in 64studio 3.0


>   
>> - I really do miss qtractor being installed as default.
>>     
>
> Because of my hardware I need to use Windows and Cubase (this not only
> is an disadvantage ;)), but I agree, QTractor and MusE seems to be very
> interesting, but also very unstable, while Rosegarden (excepted for my
> hardware) is stable.
>   
Qtractor is pretty stable I believe and has a nice gui for newbies and 
Windows users.... Does others have experience with it? I would include 
this in 64studio and maybe leave LMMS out of it....  (if you have to 
choose one of these)
I'm personally not really interested in Muse...



>   
>> rakarrack
>>   
>>     
>
> This is a very good Linux application, not only for guitarists. I
> recommended to include it. By the way jconv and rakarrack are very good
> (even if they are light-years away from GuitarRig and the ArtsReverb for
> Windows.)
>   
+1
Also guitarix may be of interest (as default or in the repo). It uses 
jconv and has also a gui for it.
More info here: http://linuxmusicians.com/viewtopic.php?f=44&t=279
>   
>> mplayer or vlc (which could work nice with jack)?
>>   
>>     
>
> mplayer is a pain, vlc is more reliable
>   
I use VLC most of the time. For playing audio with jack I use alsaplayer 
most of the time.
>   
>> Why should I choose 64studio instead of default Ubuntu or Debian?
>>   
>>     
>
> For non-music distros there is a big problem, audio repositories often
> are fine and than a distro like e.g. Suse is much better than 64 Studio
> or JAD, but very often and I mean really very, very often music packages
> for non-music distros aren't stable, while a music distro takes care
> about things, non-musical gifted package builders with odd homestudios
> for non-music-distros most times don't know what they have to take care
> about.
>
>   
It's great that 64studio has a nice and stable base for audio production!
It would be nice if the apps which are installed by default gives a good 
picture of what is possible with Linux in the music production area. And 
it would be great if the users can install a lot of extra audio packages 
from the repo.

Regards.

\r
_______________________________________________
64studio-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users

Reply via email to