Gustin Johnson wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Folderol wrote: > >> On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:35:06 +0200 >> Ralf Mardorf <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> Daniel James wrote: >>> >>>>> Isn't beta3 by doing upgrades using the repositories also a beta4? >>>>> >>>> It will be, but beta4 isn't ready yet. >>>> >>> Hi Daniel :) >>> >>> thanx for the information. Excepted of that fucking MIDI jitter for >>> external synths 3.0-beta3 is fine for everything I need. Unfortunately >>> external MIDI synths are very important for me, because I can't pay for >>> soundfonts or GIGs and the free soundfonts and GIGs aren't good for my >>> needs. >>> >>> 64 Studio 3.0-beta3 is fine out of the box, excepted of the MIDI jitter. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Ralf >>> >> Odd that. I've not come across any MIDI jitter and I have two hardware >> synths daisy-chained into my soundcard. >> >> > I am remixing a song for a friend, using a mix of software synths and my > micro korg. No problems detected yet. Will keep a lookout though. > Hi Gustin :)
If you don't do so right now, maybe you can test after you have done the remix, what happens if you use for drums a mix of recorded external MIDI equipment and non-recorded external MIDI equipment. I know that is a little bit uncommen, but it's the hardest test that can be done. I need to record external synths and to sync them with non-recorded external synths. I do not need to do it especially with drums, but anyway, I've got too much jitter to do it even for strings. Cheers, Ralf _______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
