-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Jack-Devel] Jack Transport improvements Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:48:54 +0100 From: rosea grammostola <[email protected]> CC: [email protected] References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Paul Davis wrote: > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 2:16 AM, alex stone <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Gabriel, a question. How difficult would it be to introduce a coded >> function in each jack app that "talks" to other apps, so each client >> is aware of other clients, timewise, outside of mmc, mtc, etc..... >> >> So for example, Ardour is aware of Hydrogen, Rosegarden is aware of >> Ardour and Hydrogen, etc... >> >> Would this improve timesync and variable tempo markings, and enable a >> "true" sync between apps? >> > > > add to that a looping implementation like the one proposed by jesse > chappell years ago, and you're good to go. > Is that proposal of Jesse Chappell online somewhere? \r > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [Jack-Devel] Jack Transport improvements > Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 08:04:56 -0600 (CST) > From: Gabriel M. Beddingfield <[email protected]> > To: rosea grammostola <[email protected]> > CC: [email protected] > References: <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> > > > > On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, rosea grammostola wrote: > > >> add to that a looping implementation like the one proposed by jesse > >> chappell years ago, and you're good to go. > >> > > Is that proposal of Jesse Chappell online somewhere? > > FWIW, I'm trying to search the archives. > > Anybody know where I can find Jack-Devel archives between > 2001 and 2006? The ones at tux.org appear to be... gone. > > -gabriel Are you serious? You need information that is outdated since 4 up to 9 years? Yesterday I asked Sebastian Moors, if it's thinkable, if there ever would be Hydrogen as DSSI or LV2. You are seriously thinking about session handlers and sync to various applications, instead of doing the same, that is done for Windows since the stone age? We need one sequencer + hard disk recorder that is able to include any other app, thus for Linux it means, that e.g. Ardour, Rosegarden or Qtractor should be able to be a sequencer and hard disk recorder and automated mixing console etc. in one and to load e.g. Hydrogen as a DSSI or LV2 instead of trying to sync and session handle such stuff. Is there anybody out there to open her/ his brain? Are you mad? Why not doing the most simplification? Explanations are welcome! Maybe I overlooked something :D. Cheers, Ralf _______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
