Ralf Mardorf wrote: > rosea grammostola wrote: >> I think you overlooked something yes. Yourself.... when asking who is >> mad here. >> >> What the "piep" are you doing in this thread if you don't need an >> improved Jack Transport. Grab your Windows partition and enjoy >> yourself! Why use Linux if Windows was better in the Stone Ages already? >> >> A week ago you was screaming for jackdbus and Ladish in distro's on >> different mailinglists, you needed a better way for session handling >> then the scripts you have. And now you can't find any reason for a >> session handler? Are you serious? >> >> Btw. why do you use the word 'we' if you mean 'I'? >> >> And why in heavens name did you have to reply your message to and >> Jack-devel and 64studio and hydrogen and qtractor developers? Why not >> also to the rosegarden, lau, lad, ardour, lv2, dssi and ladi list? :/ >> >> Who is mad! >> >> \r > > Hi Rosea :) > > you're right, it wasn't very smart to write this mail, this way. Hm, > was there a flamewar? I had no time to read all mail and I don't have > time to read them now, if there was a flamewar, sorry for that. I'll > read my mails next week, but don't reply to any flame ;).
Thanks for your message. Sorry is accepted. All the best, \r _______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
