Paul Davis wrote: > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Ralf Mardorf <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Are you serious? You need information that is outdated since 4 up to 9 years? >> > > Nothing in Jesse's proposal is out of date. >
Pardon, you might be right here and I might be wrong here. I don't know his proposal. > >> You are seriously thinking about session handlers and sync to various >> applications, instead of doing the same, that is done for Windows since the >> stone age? >> > > [ ... ] > > >> Explanations are welcome! Maybe I overlooked something :D. >> > > We look forward to your application and/or plugins, whenever it/they appears. > > If you want to argue for the merits of the single application ghetto, > you're going to do have to do better than "Windows has done it that > way since the stone age". I happen to think that there are some good > arguments in its favor, but you didn't make any of them. There are > also some good arguments in favor of process-level modularity, but you > didn't tackle of them either. > I do write shell scripts for Linux that will handle my sessions. I'm using e.g. Qtractor + Hydrogen, but for me Hydrogen is just a drum-sample-player, while Qtractor is the sequencer. I can't see any advantage to use Hydrogen's step-sequencer in addition to Qtractor. Yes, IMO a single application "ghetto" is the right way. Hm? Isn't it an advantage to have a hard disc recorder + MIDI sequencer in one application? When I do copy and paste, while using Qtractor and Hydrogen as a MIDI-sample-player I only need to copy and paste clips for Qtractor. If anybody is using Qtractor or Rosegarden as a the MIDI sequencer and Ardour as the hard disk recorder and Hydrogen as the step-sequencer for drums, than this person has to copy and paste 3 times and in addition he needs to write a shell script to launch and set up everything. ;). Ralf _______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
