Hello all, I personally support the adoption of this draft, it provides a better addressing solution for particular wirelined IoT scenarios, it will reduce complexity and save energy in an IoT LLN network, which sounds fairly attractive and amazing. Thanks. Best. Jian Wang Welcome to https://github.com/w13915984028?tab=repositories
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 12:40 PM Marco Carugi <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I also support the WG adoption of draft-li-6lo-native-short-address-03 for > the same reason highlighted by Alex. > > Regards, Marco Carugi - AIOTI (Alliance for IoT Innovation) WG > Standardization expert > > > Le jeu. 4 août 2022 à 11:54, Galis, Alex <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> 4th August 2022 >> >> Hi All >> >> I support the adoption call for draft-li-6lo-native-short-address-03 as >> it would enable IP networks to utilize fewer resources from constrained >> nodes. >> >> Best Regards >> >> Alex Galis >> >> On 4 Aug 2022, at 09:52, Luigi IANNONE < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> ⚠ Caution: External sender >> >> Hi, >> >> I would like to join Li Guangpeng in thanking Pascal. His great feedback >> made the document much better and the solution more robust. >> As for the comments in the last mail, they look more subjective than >> technically objective. >> >> As a co-authors I support adoption. >> >> Ciao >> >> L. >> >> >> >> *From:* 6lo <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Liguangpeng (Roc, >> Network Technology Laboratory) >> *Sent:* Wednesday, 3 August 2022 09:01 >> *To:* Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <[email protected]> >> *Cc:* Carles Gomez Montenegro <[email protected]>; 6lo <[email protected] >> > >> *Subject:* Re: [6lo] Call for WG adoption of >> draft-li-6lo-native-short-address-03 >> >> Hi Pascal and all, >> >> As we know, the discussion of whether routing in LLN networks should run >> at Layer 2 or Layer 3 (network layer) has become a very sensitive issue for >> a long time. With the advent of multiple low-power link layer >> technologies, such as IEEE 802.15.4, Wi-Fi, and PLC, network layer routing >> is clearly required. However, the separation of mesh-under and route-over >> processes induces suboptimal routes and (L2 and L3) duplicated re-route >> overhead. >> >> This draft’s topological addressing method can integrate address and >> route information into a single place. It will help to run IP layer on >> various link layer technologies and meanwhile avoid above duplicated >> re-route issues. >> >> Thanks Pascal for continuous advices and comments. As author of this >> draft, I want to state support of this adoption. >> >> Regards, >> Guangpeng Li >> >> *From:* 6lo <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Pascal Thubert >> (pthubert) >> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 3, 2022 12:37 PM >> *To:* Jing Wang <[email protected]> >> *Cc:* Carles Gomez Montenegro <[email protected]>; 6lo <[email protected] >> > >> *Subject:* Re: [6lo] Call for WG adoption of >> draft-li-6lo-native-short-address-03 >> >> Hello Carles >> >> I have reviewed the work carefully. >> >> I believe that we can achieve short packets with 6lo and SCHC so that >> piece is not an essential progress. So 6lo as an INT areaWg does not need >> it.The essential progress is meshing without routing. It’s probably hard >> to justify it at the routing area though the authors could try. >> >> My feeling is that the idea is interesting but has a very narrow >> applicability, which is in essence the opposite of IP. The progress applies >> only to very specific L2 networks. This tells me that it is really an L2 >> technology and should be used for MAC not IP. >> >> Bottom line is that I do not believe that the work belongs to the IETF. >> I do not support adoption at 6lo. >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Pascal >> >> >> >> Le 2 août 2022 à 18:01, Jing Wang <[email protected]> a écrit : >> >> >> Hi WG, >> >> I support the adoption call. In my opinion, this can help enlarge >> scope of IP network, considering it may consume less resource of >> constrained nodes. >> >> BR, >> Jing Wang >> >> >> *From:* Carles Gomez Montenegro <[email protected]> >> *Date:* 2022-08-01 22:58 >> *To:* 6lo <[email protected]> >> *Subject:* [6lo] Call for WG adoption of >> draft-li-6lo-native-short-address-03 >> Dear 6lo WG, >> >> This message starts a call for WG adoption for >> draft-li-6lo-native-short-address-03. >> >> (Link below: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-li-6lo-native-short-address-03 >> ) >> >> Considering that some folks may be on vacation currently or in the next >> few days, the call will end on the 22nd of August, EOB. >> >> Please state whether you are in favor of adopting this document. >> >> Also, any comments you may have, and/or expressions of interest to review >> the document, will be very much appreciated. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Shwetha and Carles >> >> _______________________________________________ >> 6lo mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo >> >> _______________________________________________ >> 6lo mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo >> >> _______________________________________________ >> 6lo mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> 6lo mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo >> > _______________________________________________ > 6lo mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo >
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
