Hi Michael, Resiliency is indeed a very important issue and we wrote an entire document on it: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-nsa-reliability/
If by any chance you have time and can give us feedback on that one ;-) Ciao L. > -----Original Message----- > From: 6lo <6lo-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Michael Richardson > Sent: Friday, 12 August 2022 17:43 > To: 6lo <6lo@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [6lo] Call for WG adoption of > draft-li-6lo-native-short-address-03 > > > > believe that it has positive feedback from 6lo WG. As Pascal said, > > this draft has better to consider the narrow applicability and try to > > find a common/general use case. > > Why would we spend time on a document that hasn't got a clear use case? > > I watched the 6lo recording (conflict with jwp BOF) yesterday, and the > question about resiliency and alternate paths is a very serious one. > Is this a routing protocol or not? > > I do not support adoption of the document. > > -- > Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) > Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide > > > _______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list 6lo@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo
