Michael et al. On Thu, Dec 4, 2025 at 3:17 PM Michael Richardson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I'm for adopting rfc8163-bis. > I think that I read -00 a few months ago. > > Given the update that Dave Robin mentions, is the ANSI/ASHRAE 135 update > upwards compatible? > > The main change to the ANSI/ASHRAE 135 BACnet since RFC 8163 is a name change of MS/TP to Multidrop Serial Bus/Token Passing, along with terminology changes in the spec to reflect this, e.g. :s/master/manager. Are there wire-changes against RFC8163? Please add a changes-since-8163 > section. > No. The only technical change is fixing an errata that was discovered after RFC 8163 was published. > Can 8163 continue to run over the updated spec? > Yes. No wire format changes. > Can 8163 and 8163-bis interoperate? > Yes. No wire format changes. Cheers, Kerry > > -- > Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) > Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide > > > > > _______________________________________________ > 6lo mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ 6lo mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
