Hi Geoff, On 3/4/07, Geoff Mulligan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We need to settle on an agenda for the upcoming meeting. I think that everything is progressing with our two drafts - Thanks to Gabriel for making the last minute editorial fixes.
Great!
Since we already have a draft (expired) for ND we should seriously consider finishing this work. >
Agree. I am submitting the updated version of ND draft before the cut-off date. Also submitting the updated version of lowpan-mobility requirement draft for a reference point of discussion.
I think that the main topic for the meeting is the rechartering, but I think that it is extremely important that we talk with the Manet group and understand if their work can apply to 6lowpans. This understanding though may be based on the network architecture that we are trying to build. This is why I think that we should start with defining the 6lowpan arch.
6lowpan architecture document is needed. Currently ND draft has some assumption about the topology and architecture of 6lowpan. We can start from there. Thanks, -Samita _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
