Geoff, >I think that the main topic for the meeting is the rechartering, but I >think that it is extremely important that we talk with the Manet group >and understand if their work can apply to 6lowpans. > >This understanding though may be based on the network architecture that >we are trying to build. This is why I think that we should start with >defining the 6lowpan arch.
I have my two thumbs-up for your suggestion to start with defining the 6lowpan arch. While I have been approaching 6lowpan work from routing perspective, I strongly felt that we need architecture, framework, specific requirements for 6lowpan beforehand of all details. I would like to happily involve this work, if there is any space to fill up. :-) >Additionally, we need to reach some consensus on: > * Routing (scalable, mesh under, route over) > * Security > * bootstrapping/commissioning In terms of routing, I would like to suggest to have the same approach with Arch. work. We need to think more fundamental perspective for routing before going further to the details. Thanks, - eunsook _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
