Hi, I'd like to point out the ongoing work on securing neighbor discovery (draft-haddad-mipshop-optisend-02). We're planning to submit an updated version to the 6lowpan WG once the new charter is approved.
Comments appreciated. Regards, Wassim H. On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, Samita Chakrabarti wrote: > Hi Geoff, > > On 3/4/07, Geoff Mulligan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We need to settle on an agenda for the upcoming meeting. I think that > > everything is progressing with our two drafts - Thanks to Gabriel for > > making the last minute editorial fixes. > > > > Great! > > > Since we already have a draft (expired) for ND we should seriously > > consider finishing this work. > > > Agree. > I am submitting the updated version of ND draft before the cut-off date. > > > Also submitting the updated version of lowpan-mobility requirement draft > for a reference point of discussion. > > > I think that the main topic for the meeting is the rechartering, but I > > think that it is extremely important that we talk with the Manet group > > and understand if their work can apply to 6lowpans. > > > > This understanding though may be based on the network architecture that > > we are trying to build. This is why I think that we should start with > > defining the 6lowpan arch. > > 6lowpan architecture document is needed. Currently ND draft has some > assumption about the topology and architecture of 6lowpan. We can start > from there. > > Thanks, > -Samita > > _______________________________________________ > 6lowpan mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan > > _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
