Overall looks good to me. Here is several comments at this stage.

COMMENT 1:

[cut and paste]
The Working Group will generate the necessary documents to ensure
interoperable implementations of 6LoWPAN networks and will define the
necessary security and management protocols and constructs for
building 6LoWPAN networks, paying particular attention to protocols
already available.
[snip]

Given the description above, WG should produce "6LoWPAN management
protocols or method" a.k.a. MIB for 6LoWPAN management. I had seen
Mark's positive opinion on this work during our session meeting.


COMMENT 2:

[cut and paste]
1. Produce "6LoWPAN Bootstrapping and 6LoWPAN IPv6 ND Optimizations"
to define limited extensions to IPv6 Neighbor Discovery [RFC4861] for
use specifically in low-power networks. This document (or documents)
will define how to bootstrap a 6LoWPAN network and explore ND
optimizations such as reusing the structure of the 802.15.4 network
(e.g., by using the coordinators), and reduce the need for multicast
by having devices talk to coordinators (without creating a single
point-of-failure, or changing the semantics of the IPv6 ND
multicasts). This document or documents will be a proposed standard.
[snip]

Given the sentence above, both bootstrapping and ND optimization will
be merged into one deliverable if I am correct. But, I don't think it
is a reasonable way. So, my suggestion is to have both deliverables
for each subject.


COMMENT 3:
I don't have a strong opinion on this matter, but I guess we should
consider how to improve the quality of RFC 4944, especially Global
Address HC, TCP operation, ICMPv6 operation and etc. RFC 4944-bis is
one of options.


COMMENT 4:

Just curious how to dig out *mobility issue* from the proposed
charter. I guess some of requirements of mobility for 6lowpan networks
is doable for the initial activity at this stage except spcific
mobility solutions.



Thanks,

Daniel Park [at] SAMSUNG Electronics.

_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan

Reply via email to