Hi Carsten: I do believe that the charter is quite good at this point. It is open to architecture with mesh under and routing over, and does not seem limited to 802.15.4 (at least item 3, 4 and 5 are not, right?).
I would appreciate a sentence to enable maintenance work on existing RFCs (e.g.. RFC 4944 for LP WIFI), and some capability to handle requirements from other parties (e.g.. new 6LoWPAN headers required other parties such as ISA100.11a). We also need to understand which group is in charge of the LoWPAN node requirements for IPv6. If that's 6LoWPAN, then I do believe we should have a charter item for it. To answer Carsten's question, I'm willing to help on work item 1 "6LoWPAN Bootstrapping and 6LoWPAN IPv6 ND Optimizations". I believe it can be stable by end of '08 if a number of choices are made to the simpler. I'm also willing to start some work on fragment recovery if that can be added to the charter. Pascal >-----Original Message----- >From: Carsten Bormann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: jeudi 6 décembre 2007 20:08 >To: 6lowpan >Cc: Carsten Bormann >Subject: [6lowpan] Charter proposal > >Lowpanners, > >Geoff and I have updated the charter proposal based on Marks >input and yesterday's discussion. >Now would be a good time for comments, in particular also on >the timelines we are promising. >Separately, we would like to know which of the items you are >interested in contributing to -- please volunteer now. > >Gruesse, Carsten > > _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
