Hi, Carsten and Pascal, I also think the current proposed charter is in good shape.
> [..] > We also need to understand which group is in charge of the LoWPAN node > requirements for IPv6. If that's 6LoWPAN, then I do believe we should have a > charter item for it. > Pascal, we had a good informal meeting with a few volunteer, from your initiation. I think we can work on it, ask 6lowpaners' feedback and comments, and if it's the right way to bring to other WG, we can do it after 6lowpaners' feedback. The important thing is that many 6lowpan implementors share the necessary of the work. Of course, it would be more than great if we can officially charter on the item. -eunsook > To answer Carsten's question, I'm willing to help on work item 1 "6LoWPAN > Bootstrapping and 6LoWPAN IPv6 ND Optimizations". I believe it can be stable > by end of '08 if a number of choices are made to the simpler. I'm also > willing to start some work on fragment recovery if that can be added to the > charter. > > Pascal > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Carsten Bormann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Sent: jeudi 6 décembre 2007 20:08 > >To: 6lowpan > >Cc: Carsten Bormann > >Subject: [6lowpan] Charter proposal > > > >Lowpanners, > > > >Geoff and I have updated the charter proposal based on Marks > >input and yesterday's discussion. > >Now would be a good time for comments, in particular also on > >the timelines we are promising. > >Separately, we would like to know which of the items you are > >interested in contributing to -- please volunteer now. > > > >Gruesse, Carsten > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > 6lowpan mailing list > [email protected] > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan > _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
