JP,
That was a mistake. I followed it up with a message to the list asking
for responses on whether the document should become a WG doc.
Please folks on the 6lowpan list respond and let us know if you think the
Use Case document is ready to become a WG draft.
geoff
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:08 AM, JP Vasseur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Geoff,
>
> In another email you wrote:
>
> "
> Jonathan please submit your draft draft-hui-6lowpan-hc-01
> Eunsook please also submit your draft draft-ekim-6lowpan-scenarios-03"
>
> Is the second ID adopted as a WG (since below you asked for feed-back) ?
>
> Thanks.
>
> JP.
>
>
> On 9/22/08 5:52 AM, "Geoff Mulligan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The document draft-ekim-6lowpan-scenarios-03 has been stable for some
> time now and this is a chartered item.
>
> Are you "in favor of" or "opposed to" adopting
> draft-ekim-6lowpan-scenarios-03
> (http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ekim-6lowpan-scenarios-03.txt)
> as a 6lowpan Working Group Document?
>
> Thanks,
> geoff
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> 6lowpan mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
>
>
_______________________________________________
6lowpan mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
