Hi Geoff, As you mentioned, the Use Cases document has been stable for quite some time, and it has sparked a lot of interest. I am therefore "in favor of" Working Group adoption.
Greetings, Dominik On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Geoff Mulligan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > JP, > That was a mistake. I followed it up with a message to the list asking > for responses on whether the document should become a WG doc. > > Please folks on the 6lowpan list respond and let us know if you think the > Use Case document is ready to become a WG draft. > > geoff > > > On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:08 AM, JP Vasseur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi Geoff, >> >> In another email you wrote: >> >> " >> Jonathan please submit your draft draft-hui-6lowpan-hc-01 >> Eunsook please also submit your draft draft-ekim-6lowpan-scenarios-03" >> >> Is the second ID adopted as a WG (since below you asked for feed-back) ? >> >> Thanks. >> >> JP. >> >> On 9/22/08 5:52 AM, "Geoff Mulligan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> The document draft-ekim-6lowpan-scenarios-03 has been stable for some >> time now and this is a chartered item. >> >> Are you "in favor of" or "opposed to" adopting >> draft-ekim-6lowpan-scenarios-03 >> (http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ekim-6lowpan-scenarios-03.txt) >> as a 6lowpan Working Group Document? >> >> Thanks, >> geoff >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> _______________________________________________ >> 6lowpan mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan > > > _______________________________________________ > 6lowpan mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan > > _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
