Thanks for your support and comments. :) I will consider your comment for the revision. Thanks.
-eunah On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 1:00 AM, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi: > > > > This draft is a pretty good entry point to understand the work in this > group. I support adopting it into an informational track. > > I think that for th enext release, the authors should be more crisp wrt to > LoWPAN in general vs. 802.15.4 in particular. > > As we move forward, we are extending the concept of LoWPAN to a larger range > of radios. > > For instance, I expect that 802.11LP will be considered a LoWPAN and there > is no concept of corordicator there. > > > > Pascal > > ________________________________ > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Geoff Mulligan > Sent: lundi 22 septembre 2008 05:52 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [6lowpan] Use Cases Draft ready as WG document? > > > > The document draft-ekim-6lowpan-scenarios-03 has been stable for some > time now and this is a chartered item. > > Are you "in favor of" or "opposed to" adopting > draft-ekim-6lowpan-scenarios-03 > (http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ekim-6lowpan-scenarios-03.txt) as > a 6lowpan Working Group Document? > > Thanks, > geoff > > > _______________________________________________ > 6lowpan mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan > > _______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
