On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 18:24, Juergen Schoenwaelder < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:56:25AM +0200, "Ki-Hyung Kim (?????????)" wrote: > > > As Alex mentioned, I think it is a right time to discuss the 6lowpan > > MIB as a WG item. I want to ask for a working group consensus on > > this. > > It is not clear to me what the scope of the proposed MIB module work > would be. For example, the ID <draft-daniel-6lowpan-mib-00.txt> has > routing tables inside - perhaps this belongs to a roll effort? Current version of the draft assumes mesh-under routing in adaptation layer because we have the mesh header in 6lowpan format (RFC4944). It is not yet decided whether 6lowpan will have mesh-under routing or not. However, I think it could be the starting point at least for the 6lowpan MIB. I am > also missing text explaining which parts of other standard IPv6 MIB > modules are applicable. Thank you for pointing it out. we would try to include that in the next versions. > And then I like to know how this MIB module is > expected to be implemented - on each 6LowPAN node or just on a base > station / gateway, using SNMP contexts to address the 6LowPAN nodes? This MIB is designed for the 6LoWPAN devices (6lowpan node and 6lowpan router (aka, 6lowpan forwarder)), not for the 6lowpan edge router (aka, gateway). Edge router MIB could also be defined for the white board data structure and the information which is static throughout the whole 6lowpan. > > > In short, I am missing a high-level description of the scope of the > MIB module work to be carried out as a chartered WG item. We would add the high-level description of the work in the next version as you pointed out. > > > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> > __ /khk
_______________________________________________ 6lowpan mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan
